Background. Assessment methods for atopic dermatitis (AD) are not standardized, and therapeutic studies are difficult to interpret. Aims. To obtain a consensus on assessment methods in AD and to use a statistical method to develop a composite severity index.Methods. Consensus definitions were given for items used in the scoring system (extent, intensity, subjective) and illustrated for intensity items. Slides were reviewed to address within and between-observer variability by a group of 10 trained clinicians, and data were statistically evaluated with a two way analysis of variance. Two variants of an assessment system were compared in 88 patients at 5 different institutions. Data were analyzed using principal-component analysis. Results. For 5 intensity items studied (erythema, edema/papulation, oozing/crusts, excoriations, lichenification), within- and between-observer variability was good overall, except for edema/papulation which was difficult to assess with slides. In the series of 88 patients, principal-component analysis allowed to extract two unrelated components: the first one accounting for 33% of total variance was interpreted as a ‘severity’ component; the second one, accounting for 18% of variance, was interpreted as a ‘profile’ component distinguishing patients with mostly erythema and subjective symptoms and those with mostly lichenification and dryness and lower subjective symptoms. Of the two evaluation systems used, the one using the rule of nine to assess extent was found more workable than the one using a distribution × intensity product. A scoring index (SCORAD) combining extent, severity and subjective symptoms was mathematically derived from the first system and showed a normal distribution of the population studied. Conclusion. The final choice for the evaluation system was mostly made based on simplicity and easy routine use in outpatient clinics. Based on mathematical appreciation of weights of the items used in the assessment of AD, extent and subjective symptoms account for around 20% each of the total score, intensity items representing 60%. The so-designed composite index SCORAD needs to be further tested in clinical trials.

Neonatal lupus erythematosus is an uncommon syndrome, which is caused by transplacental passage of maternal autoantibodies to Sjögren's syndrome A or B autoantigens. The clinical presentation includes distinctive cutaneous lesions resembling those seen in systemic lupus erythematosus, hepatobiliary disease, and cytopenias, which disappear with the clearance of maternal autoantibodies. The most severe presentation is a total atrioventricular heart block, which begins during the second trimester of gestation and is irreversible. The risk of having a child with neonatal lupus erythematosus in mothers who test positive for autoantibodies to Sjögren's syndrome autoantigens is approximately 2% for first pregnancies or if previous babies were healthy. The risk increases by approximately tenfold if a previous child had neonatal lupus erythematosus syndrome. The diagnosis of neonatal lupus erythematosus is made when the mother has autoantibodies to Sjögren's syndrome autoantigens, and the fetus or newborn develops atrioventricular heart block, or the newborn develops the typical rash or hepatic or hematologic manifestations in the absence of other explanation. Fetal echocardiography from the 16th to the 26th week of gestation is advised in mothers with autoantibodies to Sjögren autoantigens. The detection of a slow fetal heart rate or the postnatal diagnosis of atrioventricular heart block warrants immediate maternal testing for these autoantibodies if not previously tested.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) pruriginosa is a rare clinical subset of dystrophic EB, characterized by marked itching and presence of prurigo-like or lichenoid features. In order to further delineate the phenotype and understand the pathogenesis of this disorder, the clinical, histological and ultrastructural findings of a 19-year-old patient presenting a typical form of EB pruriginosa are described. The prevalence of papular itchy lichenoid lesions, signs of scratching and paucity of blisters at the time of clinical examination may result in incorrect diagnosis and treatment. Microscopic studies of the lesions show the typical findings of dystrophic EB associated with an unusually high density of collagen bundles and absence of elastic fibres in the upper dermis. Itching lichenoid lesions of EB pruriginosa could represent an abnormal dermal reactivity of some patients to their inherited bullous disorder.