Objective This randomized trial addressed risks and benefits of staying on antipsychotic polypharmacy versus switching to monotherapy. Method Adult outpatients with schizophrenia taking two antipsychotics (127 participants across 19 sites) were randomly assigned to Stay on Polypharmacy or Switch to Monotherapy by discontinuing one antipsychotic. The trial lasted for 6 months, with a 6-month naturalistic follow-up. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses examined time to discontinuation of assigned antipsychotic treatment, and random regression models examined additional outcomes through time. Results Individuals assigned to Switch to Monotherapy had shorter times to all-cause treatment discontinuation than those assigned to Stay (p <.05). By month 6, 86% (n=48) of those assigned to Stay on Polypharmacy were still taking both medications whereas 69% (n=40) of those assigned to Switch to Monotherapy were still taking that monotherapy. Most monotherapy discontinuations entailed returning to the original polypharmacy. Groups did not differ with respect to psychiatric symptomatology or hospitalizations. The monotherapy group lost weight whereas the polypharmacy group gained weight. Conclusions Discontinuing one of two antipsychotics was followed by treatment discontinuation more often and more quickly than when both antipsychotics were continued. However, two thirds of participants successfully switched, groups did not differ with respect to symptom control, and switching to monotherapy resulted in weight loss. This supports the reasonableness of prescribing guidelines encouraging trials of antipsychotic monotherapy for individuals receiving antipsychotic polypharmacy, with the caveat that individuals should be free to return to polypharmacy if an adequate trial on antipsychotic monotherapy proves unsatisfactory.

No abstract

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00130923.

Purpose This study examined the clinical significance of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole by examining changes in predicted risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) according to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and metabolic syndrome status. FRS estimates 10-year risk of “hard” coronary heart disease (CHD) outcomes (myocardial infarction and coronary death) while metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of CVD, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Method Changes in FRS and metabolic syndrome status were compared between patients with BMI ≥ 27 and non-HDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL randomly assigned to stay on stable current treatment (olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone) or switch to treatment with aripiprazole with 24 weeks of follow-up. All study participants were enrolled in a behavioral program that promoted healthy diet and exercise. Results The pre-specified analyses included 89 switchers and 98 stayers who had post-baseline measurements needed to assess changes. Least squares mean estimates of 10-year CHD risk decreased more for the switch (from 7.0% to 5.2%) than the stay group (from 7.4% to 6.4%) (p=0.0429). The odds ratio for having metabolic syndrome (stay vs. switch) at the last observation was 1.748 (95% CI 0.919, 3.324, p=0.0885). Conclusion Switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole was associated with larger reductions in predicted 10-year risk of CHD than the behavioral program alone. The advantage of switching on metabolic syndrome was not statistically significant. The benefits of switching must be balanced against its risks, which in this study included more discontinuations of the study treatment but no significant increase in symptoms or hospitalizations.

A total of 66 outpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-Ill) criteria for generalized anxiety disorder began treatment in a randomized double-blind study that compared the efficacy and safety of buspirone and diazepam. Thirty-nine outpatients completed the 4-week trial. Both drugs were administered in a 1:l dosage ratio; the daily prescribed dose did not exceed 40 mg. The mean daily dose of buspirone prescribed thoughout the study was significantly higher than that of diazepam. Diazepam had a significantly earlier onset of efficacy than buspirone, although both drugs were equivalent after 4 weeks of treatment. Adverse reactions were more frequent in the diazepam group. Total scores from the Hamilton anxiety scale and physician's global ratings show that diazepam was significantly superior to buspirone during the initial 2 weeks of treatment. These findings are further corroborated by the results of patients' self-rated scales. (Pharmacotherapy 1985;5(5):290-296)