No abstract

No abstract

LBA7 Background: RAM is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody VEGF-receptor 2 antagonist. We conducted a global, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PTX +/- RAM in patients with metastatic GEJ or gastric adenocarcinoma who had disease progression on or within 4 months after first-line platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based combination therapy. Methods: Pts received RAM (8 mg/kg IV q2w) or placebo (PL) plus PTX (80 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15 of a 4 week cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Eligible pts had ECOG PS ≤ 1; and adequate organ function. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and safety. Results: From Dec 2010 to Sep 2012, 665 pts were randomized (RAM+PTX: 330; PTX: 335). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. The OS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.807 (95% CI 0.678, 0.962; p=0.0169). Median OS was 9.63m for RAM+PTX and 7.36m for PTX. The HR for PFS was 0.635 (95% CI 0.536, 0.752; p <0.0001). Median PFS was 4.40m and 2.86m. Median TTP was 5.5m RAM+PTX; 3.0m PTX (p <0.0001). ORR was 28% RAM+PTX;16% PTX (p=0.0001). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) occurring in >5% of patients on RAM+PTX were: neutropenia (40.7% RAM+PTX;18.8% PTX), leukopenia (17.4% vs 6.7% ), hypertension (14.1% vs 2.4%), anemia (9.2% vs 10.3%), fatigue (7.0% vs 4.0%), abdominal pain (5.5% vs 3.3%), and asthenia (5.5% vs 3.3%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 3.1% RAM+PTX; 2.4% PTX. Conclusions: The primary endpoint of improved OS was met. A statistically significant and clinically meaningful OS benefit of > 2 months was observed for RAM+PTX vs. PTX in gastric and GEJ cancer after progression on 1st-line therapy, as were significant benefits in PFS and ORR. Neutropenia was more frequently reported in the RAM+PTX arm but incidence of febrile neutropenia was comparable between arms. Clinical trial information: NCT01170663.

Despite advancements in therapy for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers, their prognosis remains dismal. Tumor angiogenesis plays a key role in cancer growth and metastasis, and recent studies indicate that pharmacologic blockade of angiogenesis is a promising approach to therapy. In this systematic review, we summarize current literature on the clinical benefit of anti-angiogenic agents in advanced gastric cancer. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and conference proceedings including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress. Included studies aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic agents in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Each trial investigated at least one of the following endpoints: overall survival, progression-free survival/time to progression, and/or objective response rate. Our search yielded 139 publications. Forty-two met the predefined inclusion criteria. Included studies reported outcomes with apatinib, axitinib, bevacizumab, orantinib, pazopanib, ramucirumab, regorafenib, sorafenib, sunitinib, telatinib, and vandetanib. Second-line therapy with ramucirumab and third-line therapy with apatinib are the only anti-angiogenic agents so far shown to significantly improve survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Overall, agents that specifically target the vascular endothelial growth factor ligand or receptor have better safety profile compared to multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

No abstract