No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in renal transplant recipients with different function of the graft, the urinary excretion of some low molecular weight proteins and tubular enzymes frequently employed as indicators of tubular dysfunction. Urinary excretion of proteins and enzymes was measured in 51 renal transplant patients and, for comparison, in 73 patients affected by different kidney diseases with various degrees of renal function. Values of urinary beta 2-microglobulin and retinol-binding protein higher than normal were found in most transplanted patients, even in those with good renal function. On the other hand, in renal patients the urinary excretion of low molecular weight proteins was high only when creatinine clearance was lower than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Furthermore, an increased urinary excretion of tubular enzymes was found in a higher number of transplanted patients than of renal patients. This behavior was particularly evident for lysosomal enzyme N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase. In conclusion, a tubular dysfunction occurs in the transplanted kidneys, even in those with well preserved glomerular function.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the measurement of urinary excretion of the brush-border enzyme gamma glutamyl-transferase (GGT), in comparison with that of alanine aminopeptidase (AAP), as a marker for tubular toxicity due to contrast media (CM). Urinary activities of AAP and GGT were measured prior to the administration of CM and 1, 3 and 5 days after in forty-nine adult renal patients undergoing a radiological examination with intravascular administration of CM. The behavior of GGT was similar to that of AAP. In fact, urinary activities of both AAP and GGT increased greatly after CM. This effect was maximal on the 1st day and statistically significant for both enzymes. Furthermore, on the 1st day a relevant increase of enzyme activity (at least +50% over the basal value) was observed in the same number of patients (67%) for AAP and GGT. The concordance between GGT and AAP variations was high and statistically significant. Finally, different variables (osmolarity, dose of CM, and baseline renal function of the patients) had a similar effect on urinary excretion of AAP and GGT. The repeatability of duplicated determinations of GGT resulted better than that of AAP. In conclusion, the good concordance of the results of GGT with those of AAP justifies the use of GGT as a marker for tubular effects due to CM. Furthermore, the measurement of GGT has a better repeatability than that of AAP.