We sought to examine the association of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) quantified on chest computed tomography (CT) with the extent of pneumonia and adverse outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of a prospective international registry comprising 109 consecutive patients (age 64 ± 16 years; 62% male) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and noncontrast chest CT imaging. Using semi-automated software, we quantified the burden (%) of lung abnormalities associated with COVID-19 pneumonia. EAT volume (mL) and attenuation (Hounsfield units) were measured using deep learning software. The primary outcome was clinical deterioration (intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, or vasopressor therapy) or in-hospital death. Results: In multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted for patient comorbidities, the total burden of COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with EAT volume (β = 10.6, p = 0.005) and EAT attenuation (β = 5.2, p = 0.004). EAT volume correlated with serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (r = 0.361, p = 0.001) and C-reactive protein (r = 0.450, p < 0.001). Clinical deterioration or death occurred in 23 (21.1%) patients at a median of 3 days (IQR 1-13 days) following the chest CT. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, EAT volume (OR 5.1 [95% CI 1.8-14.1] per doubling p = 0.011) and EAT attenuation (OR 3.4 [95% CI 1.5-7.5] per 5 Hounsfield unit increase, p = 0.003) were independent predictors of clinical deterioration or death, as was total pneumonia burden (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.6, p = 0.002), chronic lung disease (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.7], p = 0.011), and history of heart failure (OR 3.5 [95% 1.1-8.2], p = 0.037). Conclusions: EAT measures quantified from chest CT are independently associated with extent of pneumonia and adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19, lending support to their use in clinical risk stratification.

Background and Aims Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new, non-thermal ablation modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The multi-center EU-PORIA (EUropean Real World Outcomes with Pulsed Field AblatiOn in Patients with Symptomatic AtRIAl Fibrillation) registry sought to determine the safety, efficacy, and learning curve characteristics for the pentaspline, multielectrode PFA catheter. Methods All-comer AF patients from seven high-volume centers were consecutively enrolled. Procedural and follow-up data were collected. Learning curve effects were analyzed by operator ablation experience and primary ablation modality. Results In total, 1,233 patients (61% male, mean age 66±11years, 60% paroxysmal AF) were treated by 42 operators. In 169 patients (14%), additional lesions outside the PVs were performed, most commonly at the posterior wall (n=127). Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 58 [IQR: 40-87] and 14 [9-21] min, respectively, with no differences due to operator experience. Major complications occurred in 21/1233 procedures (1.7%) including pericardial tamponade (14; 1.1%) and transient ischemic attack or stroke (n=7; 0.6%), of which one was fatal. Prior cryo-balloon users had less complications. At a median follow-up of 365 [323-386] days, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of arrhythmia-free survival was 74% (80% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF). Freedom from arrhythmia was not influenced by operator experience. In 149 (12%) patients a repeat procedure was performed due to AF recurrence and 418/584 (72%) PVs were durably isolated. Conclusion The EU-PORIA registry demonstrates a high single-procedure success rate with an excellent safety profile and short procedure times in a real-world, all-comer AF patient population.

C oronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is an unprecedented global health crisis with over 29.7 million confirmed cases worldwide as of September 17, 2020 (1). The most critical complication is acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, occurring in up to 17% of patients (2,3) which is associated with a high rate of in-hospital mortality (4,5). While the reversetranscription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay is considered the reference standard for diagnosing COV-ID-19 infection (6), chest CT has greater sensitivity for early disease detection (7). This is particularly useful in patients in whom initial RT-PCR testing is negative and a high clinical suspicion remains (8). Furthermore, chest CT findings can indicate disease stage (9-11) and predict adverse outcomes (12,13) in COVID-19 pneumonia.Characteristic CT abnormalities are bilateral patchy ground-glass opacities (GGO) with or without consolidation in a peripheral, posterior, and diffuse or lower lung zone distribution (9-11). Increasing lung consolidation is typically observed later in the disease course (10,11) and is associated with critical illness (13,14). Studies have demonstrated that the extent of diseased lungs in COVID-19 pneumonia assessed by visual scoring correlates with

Aims The aim of this study was to compare procedural efficacy and safety, including 1-year freedom from AF recurrence, between the novel cryoballoon system PolarX (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro) (Medtronic), in patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI. Methods and results This multicentre prospective observational study included 267 consecutive patients undergoing a first cryoablation procedure for paroxysmal AF (137 PolarX, 130 AFA-Pro). KM curves with the log-rank test was used to compare the 1-year freedom from AF recurrence between both groups. Multivariate Cox model was performed to evaluate whether the type of procedure (PolarX vs. AFA-Pro) had an impact on the occurrence of AF recurrences after adjustment on potentially confounding factors. The PolarX reaches lower temperatures than the AFA-Pro (LSPV 52 ± 5, vs. 59 ± 6; LIPV 49 ± 6 vs. 56 ± 6; right superior pulmonary vein: 49 ± 6 vs. 57 ± 7; right inferior pulmonary vein: 52 ± 6 vs. 59 ± 6; P &lt; 0.0001). A higher rate of transient phrenic nerve palsy was found in patients treated with the PolarX system (15% vs. 7%, P = 0.05). After a mean follow-up of 15 ± 5 months, 20 patients (15%) had recurrences in AFA-Pro group and 27 patients (19%) in PolarX group (P = 0.35). Based on survival analysis, no significant difference was observed between both groups with a 12-month free of recurrence survival of 91.2% (85.1–95.4%) vs. 83.7% (76.0%–89.1%) (log-rank test P = 0.11). In multivariate Cox model hazard ratio of recurrence for PolarX vs. AFA-Pro was not significant [HR = 1.6 (0.9–2.8), P = 0.12]. Conclusion PolarX and AFA-Pro have comparable efficacy and safety profiles for pulmonary veins isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.