Background The presence of a hypercoagulable disorder such as heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) may protect against anticoagulant‐associated bleeding. Objectives To determine the incidence of major bleeding in patients with suspected HIT. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 310 patients suspected of having HIT from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and an affiliated community hospital. We compared the cumulative incidence of major bleeding following suspicion for HIT by ultimate HIT status (HIT+ or HIT−) and exposure to an alternative anticoagulant (Tx+ or Tx−). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of new/progressive thrombosis and 30‐day mortality. Results The incidence of major bleeding was high in the HIT+Tx+, HIT− Tx+, and HIT−Tx− groups (35.7%, 44.0%, and 37.3%, respectively). The time to first major bleeding event did not differ between groups (P = .24). Factors associated with increased risk of major bleeding included intensive care unit admission (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.44‐3.47), platelet count < 25 × 109/L (HR 2.13, 1.10‐4.12), and renal dysfunction (HR 1.56, 1.06‐2.27); 35.7% of HIT+Tx+, 13.8% HIT−Tx+, and 9.3% of HIT−Tx− patients experienced new or progressive thrombosis. Mortality was similar among the three groups (26.2% HIT+Tx+, 34.5% HIT−Tx+, and 26.7% of HIT−Tx− [P = .34]). Conclusions Among patients with suspected HIT, major bleeding was common regardless of HIT status. Contrary to our hypothesis, HIT+ patients were not protected from major bleeding. A better understanding of bleeding risk is needed to inform management decisions in patients with suspected HIT.

The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) score compared favorably with the 4Ts score in a retrospective study. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the HEP score compared with the 4Ts score in a prospective cohort of 310 patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). A member of the clinical team calculated the HEP score and 4Ts score. An independent panel adjudicated HIT status based on a clinical summary as well as the results of HIT laboratory testing. The prevalence of HIT in the study population was 14.7%. At a cutoff of ≥3, the HEP score was 95.3% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.2-99.4) and 35.7% specific (95% CI, 29.8-42.0) for HIT. A 4Ts score of ≥4 had a sensitivity of 97.7% (95% CI, 86.2-99.8) and specificity of 32.9% (95% CI, 27.2-39.1). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) for the HEP score and 4Ts score were similar (0.81 [95% CI, 0.74-0.87] vs 0.76 [95% CI, 0.69-0.83]; P = .12). The HEP score exhibited a significantly higher AUC than the 4Ts score in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) (0.86 vs 0.79; P = .03). Among trainee scorers, the HEP score performed significantly better than the 4Ts score (AUC, 0.80 vs 0.73; P = .03). Our data suggest that either the 4Ts score or the HEP score may be used in clinical practice. The HEP score may be preferable in ICU patients and among less experienced clinicians.

No abstract

: Among adult patients with hemophilia A and hemophilia B the emergent management of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) is challenging, and exposure to antithrombotic agents and/or revascularization procedures may confer an enhanced risk of bleeding. We sought to identify clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes among ACS patients with hemophilia A/hemophilia B, compared with matched noncoagulopathic ACS controls. Case discharges from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1998-2011) had International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for hemophilia A/hemophilia B and ACS. Control discharges were matched to cases by year of discharge and hospital. Discharges in both groups were assessed for cardiovascular risk factors, type of ACS, use of coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), bare-metal stent and/or drug-eluting stent, bleeding, and death. In total, 237 cases and 148 848 matched controls were identified. Among cases, HIV/Hepatitis C positivity was more common and obesity/hyperlipidemia less common. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) occurred less frequently among hemophilia A cases than controls. hemophilia A and hemophilia B cases were more likely to be managed medically. Cases treated with coronary stent placement were more likely to receive a bare-metal stent than controls. Among PCI, bleeding was more common among hemophilia A cases. The death rates were comparable between groups. ACS-hemophilia A/hemophilia B cases were more often treated noninvasively compared with controls, suggesting an avoidance of PCI/coronary artery bypass grafting in this population, and bleeding (among hemophilia A) was more common. These findings support further study of the management of ACS and in-hospital outcomes among individuals with hemophilia.

Background: Individuals with hemophilia undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty are at risk for complications such as bleeding and infection. However, data on hospital length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates compared with nonhemophilic controls are lacking. This study compared the complication rates, LOS, and unplanned 30-day readmission rates between patients with hemophilia and nonhemophilic controls. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) database from 2007 to 2015 to compare outcomes in patients with hemophilia and nonhemophilic controls undergoing partial and total hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and revision knee arthroplasty. Results: A total of 118 patients with hemophilia and 3,811 controls were identified. Compared with controls, patients with hemophilia had a higher risk of bleeding complications after hip procedures (38.7% versus 16.1%, p = 0.003), a higher risk of surgical site infection after knee procedures (8.1% versus 1.1%, p < 0.001), longer median LOS after hip (6 versus 3 days, p < 0.001) and knee (5 versus 3 days, p < 0.001) procedures, and higher rates of unplanned 30-day readmission after hip (22.6% versus 4.1%, p < 0.001) and knee (10.3% versus 4.5%, p = 0.018) procedures. The most common reason for unplanned 30-day readmission in patients with hemophilia was bleeding or the patient’s underlying coagulopathy (25.1%). Conclusions: Patients with hemophilia undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty had a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding (hip procedures) and surgical site infections (knee procedures), longer LOS, and higher rates of unplanned 30-day readmission compared with nonhemophilic controls. Key limitations of our study include the potential for inaccurate coding, the relatively small number of patients in the hemophilia cohort, and the uneven distribution of procedure type in the hemophilia and control cohorts. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.