BACKGROUND
Inherited mutations in DNA-repair genes such as BRCA2 are associated with increased risks of lethal prostate cancer. Although the prevalence of germline mutations in DNA-repair genes among men with localized prostate cancer who are unselected for family predisposition is insufficient to warrant routine testing, the frequency of such mutations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer has not been established.
METHODS
We recruited 692 men with documented metastatic prostate cancer who were unselected for family history of cancer or age at diagnosis. We isolated germline DNA and used multiplex sequencing assays to assess mutations in 20 DNA-repair genes associated with autosomal dominant cancer-predisposition syndromes.
RESULTS
A total of 84 germline DNA-repair gene mutations that were presumed to be deleterious were identified in 82 men (11.8%); mutations were found in 16 genes, including BRCA2 (37 men [5.3%]), ATM (11 [1.6%]), CHEK2 (10 [1.9% of 534 men with data]), BRCA1 (6 [0.9%]), RAD51D (3 [0.4%]), and PALB2 (3 [0.4%]). Mutation frequencies did not differ according to whether a family history of prostate cancer was present or according to age at diagnosis. Overall, the frequency of germline mutations in DNA-repair genes among men with metastatic prostate cancer significantly exceeded the prevalence of 4.6% among 499 men with localized prostate cancer (P<0.001), including men with high-risk disease, and the prevalence of 2.7% in the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which includes 53,105 persons without a known cancer diagnosis (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
In our multicenter study, the incidence of germline mutations in genes mediating DNA-repair processes among men with metastatic prostate cancer was 11.8%, which was significantly higher than the incidence among men with localized prostate cancer. The frequencies of germline mutations in DNA-repair genes among men with metastatic disease did not differ significantly according to age at diagnosis or family history of prostate cancer. (Funded by Stand Up To Cancer and others.)
Intra-individual tumor heterogeneity may reduce the efficacy of molecularly guided systemic therapy for cancers that have metastasized. To determine whether the genomic alterations in a single metastasis provide a reasonable assessment of the major oncogenic drivers of other dispersed metastases within an individual, we analyzed multiple tumors from men with disseminated prostate cancer by whole exome sequencing, array CGH and RNA transcript profiling and compared the genomic diversity within and between individuals. In contrast to substantial heterogeneity between men, there was limited diversity comparing metastases within an individual. Numbers of somatic mutations, the burden of genomic copy number alterations, and aberrations in known oncogenic drivers were highly concordant as were metrics of androgen receptor (AR) activity and cell cycle activity. AR activity inversely associated with cell proliferation, whereas the expression of Fanconi anemia (FA) complex genes correlated with elevated cell cycle progression, E2F1 expression and RB1 loss. Men with somatic aberrations in FA complex genes or ATM exhibited significantly longer treatment response durations to carboplatin compared to men without defects in genes encoding DNA repair proteins. Collectively, these data indicate that though exceptions exist, evaluating a single metastasis provides a reasonable assessment of the major oncogenic driver alterations present in disseminated tumors within an individual, and may be useful for selecting treatments based on predicted molecular vulnerabilities.
The precise definition and the population used to estimate lead time and overdiagnosis can be important drivers of study results and should be clearly specified.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.