Objective: Studies investigating the health effects of prolonged intermittent fasting during Ramadan among Muslim patients on hemodialysis (HD) are limited and reported heterogeneous findings. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent fasting during Ramadan on nutritional and functional status of patients on maintenance HD. Design and methods: This was a 12-week, multicenter, prospective observational study. The study setting included three HD centers. Adult Muslim patients, who were undergoing HD session thrice weekly and planned to fast during Ramadan, were screened for eligibility and recruited. Nutritional and functional status assessments were carried out 2 weeks before (V0), at the fourth week of Ramadan (V1), and 4 weeks after Ramadan (V2). Nutritional status parameters included anthropometry (body mass index, interdialytic weight gain, waist circumference), body composition (mid-arm circumference, triceps skinfold, body fat percentage), blood biochemistry (albumin, renal profile, lipid profile, and inflammatory markers), blood pressure, dietary intake, and handgrip strength. Changes in nutritional and functional status parameters across study timepoints were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: A total of 87 patients completed the study, with 68 patients (78.2%) reporting fasting ≥20 days. Ramadan fasting led to significant reductions (all P < .05) in body mass index, interdialytic weight gain, waist circumference, mid-arm circumference, fat tissue mass, and body fat percentage, but these were not accompanied by any significant change in lean tissue mass (P > .05). Significant improvement was observed in serum phosphate levels, but serum albumin, urea, and creatinine were also reduced significantly during Ramadan (P < .05). There were no significant changes in lipid profile and inflammatory markers. Interestingly, energy and protein intakes remain unchanged during Ramadan. Handgrip strength improved significantly during Ramadan and further improved after Ramadan. Conclusion: Intermittent Ramadan fasting leads to temporary changes in nutritional status parameters and poses nondetrimental nutritional risk for patients on maintenance HD.

BackgroundThis study aimed to assess the situational capacity for nutrition care delivery in the outpatient hemodialysis (HD) setting in Malaysia by evaluating dietitian accessibility, nutrition practices and patients’ outcomes.MethodsA 17-item questionnaire was developed to assess nutrition practices and administered to dialysis managers of 150 HD centers, identified through the National Renal Registry. Nutritional outcomes of 4362 patients enabled crosscutting comparisons as per dietitian accessibility and center sector.ResultsDedicated dietitian (18%) and visiting/shared dietitian (14.7%) service availability was limited, with greatest accessibility at government centers (82.4%) > non-governmental organization (NGO) centers (26.7%) > private centers (15.1%). Nutritional monitoring varied across HD centers as per albumin (100%) > normalized protein catabolic rate (32.7%) > body mass index (BMI, 30.7%) > dietary intake (6.0%). Both sector and dietitian accessibility was not associated with achieving albumin ≥40 g/L. However, NGO centers were 36% more likely (p = 0.030) to achieve pre-dialysis serum creatinine ≥884 μmol/L compared to government centers, whilst centers with dedicated dietitian service were 29% less likely (p = 0.017) to achieve pre-dialysis serum creatinine ≥884 μmol/L. In terms of BMI, private centers were 32% more likely (p = 0.022) to achieve BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 compared to government centers. Private centers were 62% less likely (p <  0.001) while NGO centers were 56% less likely (p <  0.001) to achieve serum phosphorus control compared to government centers. Patients from centers with a shared/visiting dietitian had 35% lower probability (p <  0.001) to achieve serum phosphorus levels below 1.78 mmol/L compared to centers without access to a dietitian.ConclusionsThere were clear discrepancies in nutritional care in Malaysian HD centers. Changes in stakeholder policy are required to ensure that dietitian service is available in Malaysian HD centers.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3702-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective: This study aimed to (i) determine habitual dietary patterns of Malaysian patients on hemodialysis (HD) and (ii) examine their association with nutritional status. Methods: An à posteriori approach examined 3-day dietary recalls of 382 multiethnic Malaysian patients on HD, leading to short-listing of 31 food groups. Dietary patterns were derived through principal component analysis. Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics together with nutritional parameters were examined for associations with specific dietary patterns. Results: Four dietary patterns emerged, namely, "Home Food," "Eating Out (EO)-Rice," "EO-Sugar sweetened beverages," and "EO-Noodle." Younger patients, male gender, Malay, and patients with working status were more likely to follow "EO-Rice" and "EO-Sugar sweetened beverages" patterns, while Chinese patients were more likely to consume "EO-Noodle" pattern (all P values < .05). The EO frequency was directly associated with "EO-Rice" (P = .030), "EO-Sugar sweetened beverages" (P = .040), and "EO-Noodle" (P = .001) patterns. The highest tertile of the "Home Food" pattern related to higher handgrip strength (T3 = 21.3 ± 0.74 vs. 18.0 ± 0.73 kg, P = .006), higher serum albumin (T3 = 3.99 ± 0.04 vs. T1 = 3.84 ± 0.04 g/dL, P = .027), and lower Malnutrition-Inflammation Score (T3 = 4.9 ± 0.36 vs. T1 = 6.4 ± 0.34, P = .010), along with lower Diet Monotony Index (T3 = 29.0 ± 1.1 vs. T1 = 33.0 ± 1.0, P = .030). while "EO-Rice" and "EO-Sugar sweetened beverage" patterns were associated only with higher energy intake (all P values < .001). Conclusions: These results indicated that a home-based diet inclusive of healthy food choices was associated with better nutritional status in this HD population.

Background Kidney biopsy registries all over the world benefit research, teaching and health policy. Comparison, aggregation and exchange of data is however greatly dependent on how registration and coding of kidney biopsy diagnoses are performed. This paper gives an overview over kidney biopsy registries, explores how these registries code kidney disease and identifies needs for improvement of coding practice. Methods A literature search was undertaken to identify biopsy registries for medical kidney diseases. These data were supplemented with information from personal contacts and from registry websites. A questionnaire was sent to all identified registries, investigating age of registries, scope, method of coding, possible mapping to international terminologies as well as self-reported problems and suggestions for improvement. Results Sixteen regional or national kidney biopsy registries were identified, of which 11 were older than 10 years. Most registries were located either in Europe (10/16) or in Asia (4/16). Registries most often use a proprietary coding system (12/16). Only a few of these coding systems were mapped to SNOMED CT (1), older SNOMED versions (2) or ERA-EDTA PRD (3). Lack of maintenance and updates of the coding system was the most commonly reported problem. Conclusions There were large gaps in the global coverage of kidney biopsy registries. Limited use of international coding systems among existing registries hampers interoperability and exchange of data. The study underlines that the use of a common and uniform coding system is necessary to fully realize the potential of kidney biopsy registries.

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of a phosphate mobile app (PMA), MyKidneyDiet-Phosphate Tracker ©2019, on hemodialysis (HD) patients with hyperphosphatemia. A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial design allowed randomization of patients with hyperphosphatemia to either the usual care group (UG; receiving a single dietitian-led session with an education booklet) or the PMA group (PG). Thirty-three patients in each intervention group completed the 12-week study. Post-intervention, serum phosphorus levels were reduced in both groups (PG: −0.25 ± 0.42 mmol/L, p = 0.001; UG: −0.23 ± 0.33 mmol/L, p < 0.001) without any treatment difference (p > 0.05). Patients in both groups increased their phosphate knowledge (PG: 2.18 ± 3.40, p = 0.001; UG: 2.50 ± 4.50, p = 0.003), without any treatment difference (p > 0.05). Dietary phosphorus intake of both groups was reduced (PG: −188.1 ± 161.3 mg/d, p < 0.001; UG: −266.0 ± 193.3 mg/d, p < 0.001), without any treatment difference (p > 0.05). The serum calcium levels of patients in the UG group increased significantly (0.09 ± 0.20 mmol/L, p = 0.013) but not for the PG group (−0.03 ± 0.13 mmol/L, p = 0.386), and the treatment difference was significant (p = 0.007). As per phosphate binder adherence, both groups reported a significant increase in Morisky Medication Adherence Scale scores (PG: 1.1 ± 1.2, p < 0.001; UGa: 0.8 ± 1.5, p = 0.007), without any treatment difference (p > 0.05). HD patients with hyperphosphatemia using the PMA achieved reductions in serum phosphorus levels and dietary phosphorus intakes along with improved phosphate knowledge and phosphate binder adherence that were not significantly different from a one-off dietitian intervention. However, binder dose adjustment with meal phosphate content facilitated by the PMA allowed stability of corrected calcium levels, which was not attained by UC patients whose binder dose was fixed.