Background: Little has been reported on long-term pulmonary function trends among patients with interstitial lung disease associated with anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibodies (ARS-ILD). Objectives: To clarify the factors predictive of progression in ARS-ILD based on patients’ initial clinical and radiological features. Methods: The clinical courses of 88 patients with > 1 year of follow-up data on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were retrospectively analyzed. Disease behavior was categorized into three groups: (1) improved or (2) worsened (defined as increases or decreases, respectively, of > 10% in forced vital capacity and > 15% in %diffusing capacity of lung carbon monoxide) or (3) stable based on PFT changes compared between 1-year results as the initial data and results at 3 years to assess the long-term course. Results: In the initial course of 75 patients with ARS-ILD who received anti-inflammatory therapy within 6 months after diagnosis, 48 patients (64.0%) improved and 6 patients (8.0%) worsened. The radiological patterns in the patients with ARS-ILD included nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) in 46.7% and NSIP with organizing pneumonia overlap in 52.0% of the cases. One-third of the initially improved patients who worsened over the long-term course were assigned to the unstable group. By multivariate logistic analysis, middle lobe traction bronchiectasis was a significant predictive factor for the patients in the unstable group. Conclusions: Most patients with ARS-ILD receiving anti-inflammatory therapy had improved or remained stable in the first year. However, over the long-term course, some patients worsened despite their initial improvement. Even though the extent of the disease is limited, middle lobe traction bronchiectasis in ARS-ILD may be a useful predictor of poor long-term disease behavior.

Although the use of corticosteroids is not recommended in the World Health Organization statement for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), steroid therapy may be indicated for critical cases in specific situations. Here, we report the successful treatment of 11 cases of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with favipiravir and methylprednisolone. All cases were severe and patients required oxygen administration or had a blood oxygen saturation ≤93% on room air. All were treated with favipiravir and methylprednisolone, and 10 of 11 patients responded well and required no further oxygen supplementation or ventilator management. This study shows the importance of the early-stage use of a combination of favipiravir and methylprednisolone in severe cases to achieve a favorable clinical outcome.

Background The serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) level is a predictive factor for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The development of ARDS has been reported in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to determine whether serum KL-6 levels are associated with mortality and severity in patients with COVID-19. Methods Among 361 Japanese patients with COVID-19 who were hospitalized at Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center between February 2020 and December 2020, 356 patients with data on serum KL-6 levels were enrolled and their medical records were retrospectively analyzed. Results A negative correlation was observed between KL-6 levels and the ratio of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen on admission. The KL-6 levels on admission and the maximal KL-6 levels were higher in patients with severe disease (n = 60) than in those with nonsevere disease (n = 296). Furthermore, the maximal KL-6 levels were higher in nonsurvivors (n = 6) than in survivors (n = 350). In nonsurvivors, the KL-6 levels increased as the disease progressed. The optimal cutoff value of the maximal KL-6 level for discriminating between survivors and nonsurvivors was 684 U/mL, with a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 90.5%, and an area under the curve of 0.89. Conclusions The serum KL-6 level was associated with disease severity. Patients with KL-6 levels ≥ 684 U/mL had a significantly poorer outcome than those with KL-6 levels < 684 U/mL.

Background Current clinical practice guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) conditionally recommend use of pirfenidone and nintedanib. However, an optimal treatment sequence has not been established, and the data of treatment sequence from pirfenidone to nintedanib are limited. This study aimed to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of nintedanib switched from pirfenidone in patients with IPF. Methods Thirty consecutive IPF cases, which discontinued pirfenidone because of a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) or intolerable adverse event (AE), and newly started nintedanib (150 mg twice daily) from September 2015 to August 2017 (switch-group) were retrospectively reviewed. Subsequently, we compared the characteristics, treatment status, and AEs between the switch-group and other 64 IPF patients newly started nintedanib during the same period without any prior anti-fibrotic treatment (pirfenidone-naïve group). Results In the switch group, median age, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and %FVC were 72 years old, 54.9 kg, 21.0 kg/m 2 , and 52.9%, respectively. Most common AE of nintedanib was aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase elevation (71.9%), followed by anorexia (46.7%) and diarrhea (46.7%); whereas, anorexia (63.3%) and ≥ 5% weight loss from baseline (56.7%) were common during pirfenidone administration. Sixteen patients (53.3%) discontinued nintedanib within 6 months (early termination). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between low BMI and early nintedanib termination in the switch-group ( p = 0.0239). Nintedanib suppressed FVC decline as compared with that during administration period of pirfenidone in 70% of the patients who could undergo lung function before and after switching to nintedanib. The incidence of early termination of nintedanib was higher in the switch-group than in the pirfenidone-naïve group, whereas body-weight, BMI, absolute FVC values, and %FVC were significantly lower in the switch-group (just before nintedanib initiation) than in the pirfenidone-naïve group. Nintedanib-induced anorexia was more frequent and severer in the switch-group than in the pirfenidone-naïve group, but no significant differences were observed in terms of other AEs. Conclusions A high incidence of early termination of nintedanib was noted when patients were switched from pirfenidone. Anorexia and weight loss during prior pirfenidone administration may increase the rate of the early termination of subsequent nintedanib treatment.

BackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterised by worsening dyspnoea and exercise intolerance.Research questionDoes a long-term pulmonary rehabilitation improve exercise tolerance in patients with IPF treated with standard antifibrotic drugs, which are expected to reduce disease progression?MethodsThis open-label randomised controlled trial was performed at 19 institutions. Stable patients receiving nintedanib were randomised into pulmonary rehabilitation and control groups (1:1). The pulmonary rehabilitation group underwent initial rehabilitation which included twice-weekly sessions of monitored exercise training for 12 weeks, followed by an at-home rehabilitation programme for 40 weeks. The control group received usual care only, without pulmonary rehabilitation. Both groups continued to receive nintedanib. The primary and main secondary outcomes were change in 6 min walking distance (6MWD) and change in endurance time (using cycle ergometry) at week 52.ResultsEighty-eight patients were randomised into pulmonary rehabilitation (n=45) and control (n=43) groups. Changes in 6MWD were −33 m (95% CI −65 to −1) and −53 m (95% CI −86 to −21) in the pulmonary rehabilitation and control groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (mean difference, 21 m (95% CI −25 to 66), p=0.38). Changes in endurance time were significantly better in the pulmonary rehabilitation (64 s, 95% CI −42.3 to 171)) than in the control (−123 s (95% CI −232 to −13)) group (mean difference, 187 s (95% CI 34 to 153), p=0.019).InterpretationAlthough pulmonary rehabilitation in patients taking nintedanib did not improve 6MWD in the long term, it led to prolonged improvement in endurance time.Trial registration numberUMIN000026376.