Anterior lumbar spine approaches may be indicated for fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disorders or to fill discal and bone gaps after fracture reduction. We present an anterior extraperitoneal approach applicable to any discal and vertebral levels from T12 to S1. The anatomic study, based on 25 cadavers, highlights retroperitoneal dissection principles for easy kidney and duodenopancreatic mobilisation and direct left anterior access to the entire lumbar spine. We established a precise description of the lumbar veins and the anastomoses between the left renal vein and hemiazygos system, in order to define different topographic and anatomic factors related to safe and easily reproducible approaches for cage or graft implementation. Independent of the level and previous intraperitoneal surgery, lumbar spine access with this approach safeguards the kidney, ureter, spleen, hypogastric plexus and duodenopancreatic system. Regarding operating time, blood-loss and possibilities for freshening and grafting, this technique seems an effective counterbalance to the difficulties and complex technology of endoscopic approaches. The clinical study includes our first 42 cases in traumatic and degenerative lesions. Avoiding the neurologic or hemorrhagic risk inherent in classical posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) techniques, it can be considered as a reasonable and valid alternative. This technique could be used in the near future for mini invasive discal prosthesis insertion.

No abstract

Pelvic osteotomies were developed to increase or restructure the acetabular surface. Periacetabular osteotomies are considered the most difficult from the technical point of view and necessitate sufficient residual cartilaginous surface. Juxta-acetabular osteotomies avoid major disorganization of the pelvic framework and allow easier reorientation of the acetabulum. The authors present a technical variant that preserves the entire posterior column, as in the Ganz osteotomy. The effects on the vascularisation of the periacetabular region are strictly the same and there is no necrosis of the subchondral bone. This osteotomy is easier to perform, because of a single positioning associating two simultaneous approaches. The osteotomies are rectilinear and easy to check peroperatively by fluoroscopy thanks to this positioning. Another valuable aspect of this double approach consists of very easy correction of "automatic" unwanted retroversion due to the lowering of the acetabular roof. This unintended displacement is rarely reported in the literature, despite its anatomic evidence in 3-dimensional CT-scan reconstructions for pre- and peroperative evaluation.

Intraoperative ultrasonography is recommended for operations on the thoracolumbar spine to complement the information provided by standard X-ray, intensifier screen or myelography. There are no unanimates opinions concerning the impaction or exeresis of these fragments. The aim of this study was to show the advantages of intraoperative ultrasonography for anatomic determination and control of the maneuvers used. This study included 46 cases with fractures from T11 to L2. Ultrasonography was performed during the intraoperative reduction provided by the installation and the pedicular instruments. The authors stress the limits of the anatomic and geographic determination, as well as tilting of the fragments because of the size of the ultrasonographic head. The quality of the exeresis may be falsely interpreted in the presence of fragments with a section of less than 4 mm, lateralized, double fragments or in the presence of massive intraoperative haemorrhage. Analysis of the impaction results is more complicated because all of these fragments displaced themselves secondarily. The ligamentum communis vertebralis posterior has no anatomical containing role. The tilting before the impaction and the state of the overlying intervertebral disk represent essential factors for failures. Ultrasonography is better than intraoperative myelography. Nevertheless, it still needs to be complemented by intraoperative profile X-rays and a very precise preoperative CT scan of the intervertebral disk lesions analysis of complicated cases (fragments with residual pedicular attachments--type A 3.1.2.; T-like fractures--type A 3.2.1.).