Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the testis is the pre-invasive stage of type II testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) of adolescents and adults. These tumours are the most frequently diagnosed cancer in Caucasian adolescents and young adults. In dysgenetic gonads, the precursor of type II GCTs can be either CIS or a lesion known as gonadoblastoma (GB). CIS/GB originates from a primordial germ cell (PGC)/gonocyte, ie an embryonic cell. CIS can be cured by local low-dose irradiation, with limited side effects on hormonal function. Therefore, strategies for early diagnosis of CIS are essential. Various markers are informative to diagnose CIS in adult testis by immunohistochemistry, including c-KIT, PLAP, AP-2gamma, NANOG, and POU5F1 (OCT3/4). OCT3/4 is the most informative and consistent in presence and expression level, resulting in intense nuclear staining. In the case of maturational delay of germ cells, frequently present in gonads of individuals at risk for type II (T)GCTs, use of these markers can result in overdiagnosis of malignant germ cells. This demonstrates the need for a more specific diagnostic marker to distinguish malignant germ cells from germ cells showing maturation delay. Here we report the novel finding that immunohistochemical detection of stem cell factor (SCF), the c-KIT ligand, is informative in this context. This was demonstrated in over 400 cases of normal (fetal, neonatal, infantile, and adult) and pathological gonads, as well as TGCT-derived cell lines, specifically in cases of CIS and GB. Both membrane-bound and soluble SCF were expressed, suggestive of an autocrine loop. SCF immunohistochemistry can be a valuable diagnostic tool, in addition to OCT3/4, to screen for precursor lesions of TGCTs, especially in patients with germ cell maturation delay.
Final height (FH) data of 96 children (87 girls) treated with GnRH agonist for central precocious puberty were studied. In girls mean FH exceeded initial height prediction by 7.4 (5.7) cm (p < 0.001); FH was significantly lower than target height, but still in the genetic target range. When treatment started < 6 years of age, height gain was significantly higher than when started > 8 years of age. Bone age (BA) and chronological age (CA) at start of treatment, as well as BA advance at cessation of treatment, were the most important variables influencing height gain in multiple regression analysis. BA advance at start of treatment was most important in simple correlation. In girls, GnRHa treatment seems to restore FH into the target range. A younger age and advanced bone age at start of treatment are associated with more height gain from GnRHa treatment.
The emotional reactions of parents and adult patients on disclosure of the clinical diagnosis of androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) and its later confirmation by gene mutation analysis were assessed. A semistructured interview and three questionnaires were used. Parents came from 18 different families with a total of 20 children (15 complete AIS, 5 partial AIS), 19 raised as girls, 1 as a boy. Ten adult women with complete AIS came from six families. The short-term reaction upon the clinical diagnosis was in the majority of both parents and adult patients associated with shock, grief, anger, and shame and in the mothers and adult patients with guilt. Emotional reactions were more long-lasting in mothers and adult patients than in fathers. The confirmation by DNA analysis did not alter the actual feelings of both parents. Adolescents with AIS should be informed completely – but in a step-by-step way – about their condition, since adult patients indicated that they had suffered from being not at all or misinformed about AIS in their adolescence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.