ForewordThe Pierre Auger Observatory has begun a major Upgrade of its already impressive capabilities, with an emphasis on improved mass composition determination using the surface detectors of the Observatory. Known as AugerPrime, the upgrade will include new 4 m 2 plastic scintillator detectors on top of all 1660 water-Cherenkov detectors, updated and more flexible surface detector electronics, a large array of buried muon detectors, and an extended duty cycle for operations of the fluorescence detectors.This Preliminary Design Report was produced by the Collaboration in April 2015 as an internal document and information for funding agencies. It outlines the scientific and technical case for AugerPrime 1 . We now release it to the public via the arXiv server. We invite you to review the large number of fundamental results already achieved by the Observatory and our plans for the future.The Pierre Auger Collaboration 1 As a result of continuing R&D, slight changes have been implemented in the baseline design since this Report was written. These changes will be documented in a forthcoming Technical Design Report. ix x Executive Summary Present Results from the Pierre Auger ObservatoryMeasurements of the Auger Observatory have dramatically advanced our understanding of ultra-high energy cosmic rays. The suppression of the flux around 5×10 19 eV is now confirmed without any doubt. Strong limits have been placed on the photon and neutrino components of the flux indicating that "top-down" source processes, such as the decay of superheavy particles, cannot account for a significant part of the observed particle flux. A largescale dipole anisotropy of ∼7% amplitude has been found for energies above 8×10 18 eV. In addition there is also an indication of the presence of a large scale anisotropy below the ankle. Particularly exciting is the observed behavior of the depth of shower maximum with energy, which changes in an unexpected, non-trivial way. Around 3×10 18 eV it shows a distinct change of slope with energy, and the shower-to-shower variance decreases. Interpreted with the leading LHC-tuned shower models, this implies a gradual shift to a heavier composition. A number of fundamentally different astrophysical model scenarios have been developed to describe this evolution. The high degree of isotropy observed in numerous tests of the small-scale angular distribution of UHECR above 4×10 19 eV is remarkable, challenging original expectations that assumed only a few cosmic ray sources with a light composition at the highest energies. Interestingly, the largest departures from isotropy are observed for cosmic rays with E > 5.8×10 19 eV in ∼20 • sky-windows. Due to a duty cycle of ∼15% of the fluorescence telescopes, the data on the depth of shower maximum extend only up to the flux suppression region, i.e. 4×10 19 eV. Obtaining more information on the composition of cosmic rays at higher energies will provide crucial means to discriminate between the model classes and to understand the origin of the observed flux suppre...

Editor: S. DodelsonWe report a measurement of the flux of cosmic rays with unprecedented precision and statistics using the Pierre Auger Observatory. Based on fluorescence observations in coincidence with at least one surface detector we derive a spectrum for energies above 10 18 eV. We also update the previously published energy spectrum obtained with the surface detector array. The two spectra are combined addressing the systematic uncertainties and, in particular, the influence of the energy resolution on the spectral shape. 242Pierre Auger Collaboration / Physics Letters B 685 (2010) The spectrum can be described by a broken power law E −γ with index γ = 3.3 below the ankle which is measured at log 10 (E ankle /eV) = 18.6. Above the ankle the spectrum is described by a power law with index 2.6 followed by a flux suppression, above about log 10 (E/eV) = 19.5, detected with high statistical significance.

We report a study of the distributions of the depth of maximum, Xmax, of extensive air-shower profiles with energies above 10 17.8 eV as observed with the fluorescence telescopes of the Pierre Auger Observatory. The analysis method for selecting a data sample with minimal sampling bias is described in detail as well as the experimental cross-checks and systematic uncertainties. Furthermore, we discuss the detector acceptance and the resolution of the Xmax measurement and provide parameterizations thereof as a function of energy. The energy dependence of the mean and standard 4 deviation of the Xmax-distributions are compared to air-shower simulations for different nuclear primaries and interpreted in terms of the mean and variance of the logarithmic mass distribution at the top of the atmosphere.

Using data collected at the Pierre Auger Observatory during the past 3.7 years, we demonstrated a correlation between the arrival directions of cosmic rays with energy above 6 x 10(19) electron volts and the positions of active galactic nuclei (AGN) lying within approximately 75 megaparsecs. We rejected the hypothesis of an isotropic distribution of these cosmic rays with at least a 99% confidence level from a prescribed a priori test. The correlation we observed is compatible with the hypothesis that the highest-energy particles originate from nearby extragalactic sources whose flux has not been substantially reduced by interaction with the cosmic background radiation. AGN or objects having a similar spatial distribution are possible sources.

A. AAB et al. we have examined the implications of the distributions of depths of atmospheric shower maximum (X max ), using a hybrid technique, for composition and hadronic interaction models. We do this by fitting the distributions with predictions from a variety of hadronic interaction models for variations in the composition of the primary cosmic rays and examining the quality of the fit. Regardless of what interaction model is assumed, we find that our data are not well described by a mix of protons and iron nuclei over most of the energy range. Acceptable fits can be obtained when intermediate masses are included, and when this is done consistent results for the proton and iron-nuclei contributions can be found using the available models. We observe a strong energy dependence of the resulting proton fractions, and find no support from any of the models for a significant contribution from iron nuclei. However, we also observe a significant disagreement between the models with respect to the relative contributions of the intermediate components.