Background Various observations have suggested that the course of COVID-19 might be less favourable in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases receiving rituximab compared with those not receiving rituximab. We aimed to investigate whether treatment with rituximab is associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.Methods In this cohort study, we analysed data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort, which included patients aged 18 years or older with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The primary endpoint was the severity of COVID-19 in patients treated with rituximab (rituximab group) compared with patients who did not receive rituximab (no rituximab group). Severe disease was defined as that requiring admission to an intensive care unit or leading to death. Secondary objectives were to analyse deaths and duration of hospital stay. The inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score method was used to adjust for potential confounding factors (age, sex, arterial hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, body-mass index, interstitial lung disease, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, corticosteroid use, chronic renal failure, and the underlying disease [rheumatoid arthritis vs others]). Odds ratios and hazard ratios and their 95% CIs were calculated as effect size, by dividing the two population mean differences by their SD. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04353609.

Actinomycosis is a rare heterogeneous anaerobic infection with misleading clinical presentations that delay diagnosis. A significant number of misdiagnosed cases have been reported in specific localizations, but studies including various forms of actinomycosis have rarely been published.We performed a multicenter retrospective chart review of laboratory-confirmed actinomycosis cases from January 2000 until January 2014. We described clinical characteristics, diagnostic procedures, differential diagnosis, and management of actinomycosis of clinical significance.Twenty-eight patients were included from 6 hospitals in France. Disease was diagnosed predominately in the abdomen/pelvis (n = 9), orocervicofacial (n = 5), cardiothoracic (n = 5), skeletal (n = 3), hematogenous (n = 3), soft tissue (n = 2), and intracranially (n = 1). Four patients (14%) were immunocompromised. In most cases (92 %), the diagnosis of actinomycosis was not suspected on admission, as clinical features were not specific. Diagnosis was obtained from either microbiology (50%, n = 14) or histopathology (42%, n = 12), or from both methods (7%, n = 2). Surgical biopsy was needed for definite diagnosis in 71% of cases (n = 20). Coinfection was found in 13 patients (46%), among which 3 patients were diagnosed from histologic criteria only. Two-thirds of patients were treated with amoxicillin. Median duration of antibiotics was 120 days (interquartile range 60–180), whereas the median follow-up time was 12 months (interquartile range 5.25–18). Two patients died.This study highlights the distinct and miscellaneous patterns of actinomycosis to prompt accurate diagnosis and earlier treatments, thus improving the outcome. Surgical biopsy should be performed when possible while raising histologist's and microbiologist's awareness of possible actinomycosis to enhance the chance of diagnosis and use specific molecular methods.

No abstract

No abstract

One of the essential parameters of targeted therapy efficiency in cancer treatment is the amount of drug reaching the therapeutic target area. Imatinib (IM) was the first specifically targeted drug to be developed and has revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). To evaluate cellular uptake of IM, we developed a method based on the chemical structure of the molecule and using the natural UV fluorescence that we quantified by flow cytometry. In two CML cell lines, we obtained a satisfactory relationship between intracellular IM (ICIM) levels and media concentrations, and we found a strong correlation between ICIM at 1 h and IM efficacy at 24 h, demonstrating that ICIM at 1 h might be a relevant predictive parameter of cell sensitivity. Our method was more sensitive than the standard physicochemical method. We applied our method to primary cells and found cell morphology-dependant IM accumulation. Moreover, in CML cells from patients at diagnosis, IM accumulation was heterogeneous. In all cases, ICIM at the single-cell level was much higher than in culture media arguing in favor of a predominantly active uptake process. We developed a simple method directly applicable to primary cells that has shown two major advantages: only a small number of cells are required, and cell subsets can be identified according to morphological criteria and/or the presence of particular antigenic sites. This method provides a new tool to assess CML cell sensitivity to IM, and ICIM levels in native CML cells could be used to monitor therapeutic response. ' 2012 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry