Although it is estimated that COVID-19 life-threatening conditions may be diagnosed in less than 1:1000 infected individuals below the age of 50, but the real impact of this pandemic on pediatric patients with different types of primary immunodeficiency (PID) is not elucidated. The current prospective study on a national registry of PID patients showed that with only 1.23 folds higher incidence of infections, these patients present a 10-folds higher mortality rate compared to population mainly in patients with combined immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation. Therefore, further management modalities against COVID-19 should be considered to improve the survival rate in these two PID entities using hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and immunomodulatory agents.

Highlight The emergence of CAR-T cell therapy with its exciting results attained in patients with relapsed and refractory hematological malignancies is considered as the biggest advance in cellular cancer immunotherapy. However, severe side effects and toxicity stir concerns regarding the safety of CAR-T cell treatments.Most of CAR-T cell therapies are currently autologous small-scale treatments for patients suffering from B cell malignancies due to the safety concerns about the potential development of a GVHD in allogeneic therapies. So, allogeneic therapies have been less effective than autologous ones. High cost and highly variable manufacturing processes are other limitations on the way of CAR-T cell therapy. In contrast to the unprecedented responses achieved through using CD19-CAR-T cells in the treatment of ALL, this type of treatment has not shown the same results in the battle against solid tumors that is partly related to different characteristics and microenvironment of solid tumors that limit the success of CAR-T cell therapies in patients with solid tumors. Immune checkpoint therapies with previously reported reproducible beneficial effects in 20–30% of patients with different incurable cancers have serious side effects and considerable cost of repeated administration. Also, recently most patients have not responded effectively to these therapies. In contrast, CAR-T cell therapy has two characteristics that may compensate for the limitations of immune checkpoint therapies. Firstly, only one administration of the engineered T cells is needed for long lasting effectiveness of the therapy. Secondly, more than 90% of patients suffering from ALL respond to CAR-T cell therapy, a result which is not obtained through administration of the immune checkpoints. Future development of CAR-T cell technology should address concerns related to the safety of the treatment and improve toxicity management. Also, it should extend the application of technology in diseases where its effectiveness has been demonstrated and opt for more targets and cancers.

This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as