Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphomas (PCFCLs) are indolent B-cell lymphomas that predominantly remain skin restricted and manageable with skin-directed therapy. Conversely, secondary cutaneous involvement by usual systemic follicular lymphoma (secondary cutaneous follicular lymphoma [SCFL]) has a worse prognosis and often necessitates systemic therapy. Unfortunately, no histopathologic or genetic features reliably differentiate PCFCL from SCFL at diagnosis. Imaging may miss low-burden internal disease in some cases of SCFLs, leading to misclassification as PCFCL. Whereas usual systemic FL is well characterized genetically, the genomic landscapes of PCFCL and SCFL are unknown. Herein, we analyzed clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic data from 30 cases of PCFCL and 10 of SCFL and performed whole-exome sequencing on 18 specimens of PCFCL and 6 of SCFL. During a median follow-up of 7 years, 26 (87%) of the PCFCLs remained skin restricted. In the remaining 4 cases, systemic disease developed within 3 years of diagnosis. Although the SCFLs universally expressed BCL2 and had BCL2 rearrangements, 73% of the PCFCLs lacked BCL2 expression, and only 8% of skin-restricted PCFCLs had BCL2 rearrangements. SCFLs showed low proliferation fractions, whereas 75% of PCFCLs had proliferation fractions >30%. Of the SCFLs, 67% had characteristic loss-of-function CREBBP or KMT2D mutations vs none in skin-restricted PCFCL. Both SCFL and skin-restricted PCFCL showed frequent TNFRSF14 loss-of-function mutations and copy number loss at chromosome 1p36. These data together establish PCFCL as a unique entity with biological features distinct from usual systemic FL and SCFL. We propose 3 criteria based on BCL2 rearrangement, chromatin-modifying gene mutations (CREBBP, KMT2D, EZH2, and EP300), and proliferation index to classify cutaneous FL specimens based on the likelihood of concurrent or future systemic spread.

PURPOSE Thymomas are epithelial neoplasms that represent the most common thymic tumors in adults. These tumors have been shown to harbor a relatively low mutational burden. As a result, there is a lack of genetic alterations that may be used prognostically or targeted therapeutically for this disease. Here, we describe a recurrent gene rearrangement in type B2 + B3 thymomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS A single index case of thymoma was evaluated by an RNA-based solid fusion assay. Separately, tissues from 255,008 unique advanced cancers, including 242 thymomas, were sequenced by hybrid capture–based next-generation DNA sequencing/comprehensive genomic profiling of 186 to 406 genes, including lysine methyltransferase 2A ( KMT2A) rearrangements, and a portion were evaluated for RNA of 265 genes. We characterized molecular and clinicopathologic features of the pertinent fusion-positive patient cases. RESULTS We identified 11 patients with thymomas harboring a gene fusion of KMT2A and mastermind-like transcriptional coactivator 2 ( MAML2). Fusion breakpoints were identified between exon 8, 9, 10, or 11 of KMT2A and exon 2 of MAML2. Fifty-five percent were men, with a median age of 48 years at surgery (range, 29-69 years). Concurrent genomic alterations were infrequent. The 11 thymomas were of B2 or B3 type histology, with 1 case showing foci of thymic carcinoma. The frequency of KMT2A- MAML2 fusion was 4% of all thymomas (10 of 242) and 6% of thymomas of B2 or B3 histology (10 of 169). CONCLUSION KMT2A- MAML2 represents the first recurrent fusion described in type B thymoma. The fusion seems to be specific to type B2 and B3 thymomas, the most aggressive histologic subtypes. The identification of this fusion offers insights into the biology of thymoma and may have clinical relevance for patients with disease refractory to conventional therapeutic modalities.

TP53 and ARID1A are frequently mutated across cancer but rarely in the same primary tumor. Endometrial cancer has the highest TP53-ARID1A mutual exclusivity rate. However, the functional relationship between TP53 and ARID1A mutations in the endometrium has not been elucidated. We used genetically engineered mice and in vivo genomic approaches to discern both unique and overlapping roles of TP53 and ARID1A in the endometrium. TP53 loss with oncogenic PIK3CAH1047R in the endometrial epithelium results in features of endometrial hyperplasia, adenocarcinoma, and intraepithelial carcinoma. Mutant endometrial epithelial cells were transcriptome profiled and compared to control cells and ARID1A/PIK3CA mutant endometrium. In the context of either TP53 or ARID1A loss, PIK3CA mutant endometrium exhibited inflammatory pathway activation, but other gene expression programs differed based on TP53 or ARID1A status, such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Gene expression patterns observed in the genetic mouse models are reflective of human tumors with each respective genetic alteration. Consistent with TP53-ARID1A mutual exclusivity, the p53 pathway is activated following ARID1A loss in the endometrial epithelium, where ARID1A normally directly represses p53 pathway genes in vivo, including the stress-inducible transcription factor, ATF3. However, co-existing TP53-ARID1A mutations led to invasive adenocarcinoma associated with mutant ARID1A-driven ATF3 induction, reduced apoptosis, TP63+ squamous differentiation and invasion. These data suggest TP53 and ARID1A mutations drive shared and distinct tumorigenic programs in the endometrium and promote invasive endometrial cancer when existing simultaneously. Hence, TP53 and ARID1A mutations may co-occur in a subset of aggressive or metastatic endometrial cancers, with ARID1A loss promoting squamous differentiation and the acquisition of invasive properties.