This article discusses the influence of various process parameters on the characteristics of titanium dental implants made by laser-forming techniques involving both laser sintering and laser melting. The implant models have a porous surface structure to increase bone-osseointegration and a compact core to provide the required mechanical strength. Models in the shapes of rod and cone were built using a continuous wave (CW) laser yielding a threshold compressive force as high as 1000 N after a postsintering treatment in a vacuum furnace at 1200 8C for 1.5 h. Using selective laser melting with the pulsed laser, the best parameters were found to be: scan speed of 6 mm/s, laser peak power of 1 kW, and hatching pitch of 0.4 mm yielding a tensile strength of 300 MPa and torsional fatigue strength of 100 MPa. To improve the surface wear resistance of the titanium models, laser gas nitriding using CW Nd:YAG laser was applied. The formed TiN layers had a sponge-like structure with a thickness varying from 30 to 60 mm. The hardness measured at 20 mm from the surface varied from 1000 to 600 HV by changing the scan speed from 1 to 16 mm/s.

BACKGROUND:Determining and restoring physiological vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) is the critical step during complete mouth rehabilitation. The improper VDO compromises the aesthetics, phonetics and functional efficiency of the prosthesis. Various methods are suggested to determine the accurate VDO, including the facial measurements in the clinical situations with no pre-extraction records. The generalisation of correlation between the facial measurements to VDO is criticised due to gender dimorphism and racial differences. Hence, it is prudent to verify the hypothesis of facial proportion and correlation of lower third of the face to remaining craniofacial measurements in different ethnic groups. The objective of the study was to evaluate the correlation of craniofacial measurements and OVD in the Saudi-Arabian ethnic group.METHODOLOGY:Total of 228 participants from Saudi-Arabian Ethnic group were randomly recruited in this cross-sectional study. Fifteen craniofacial measurements were recorded with modified digital Vernier callipers, and OVD was recorded at centric occlusion. The obtained data were analysed by using the Spearman’s correlation and linear regression analysis.RESULTS:The Mean OVD in male participants was higher (69.25 ± 5.54) in comparison to female participants (57.41 ± 5.32). The craniofacial measurement of Exocanthion-right labial commissure and the Mesial wall of the right external auditory canal-orbitale lateral had a strong positive correlation with VDO. The strong correlation was recorded with a trichion-upper border of right eyebrow line and trichion-Nasion only in males. Meanwhile, the length of an auricle recorded the positive correlation in female participants.CONCLUSIONS:Being simple and non-invasive technique, craniofacial measurements and linear equations could be routinely utilised to determine VDO.

Background/Purpose: Tooth size discrepancy is one of the causative factors of malocclusion. This study aimed to establish the TDS among various malocclusion classes and normal occlusion subjects in a Southern Saudi population. Materials and Methods: The study casts of orthodontic patients from Southern Saudi Arabia (mean age: 19.6 years ± 2.45; n = 120) were randomly selected and grouped into eight equal classes based on Angle's classification and gender. An additional 30 study casts, devoid of malocclusion, having excellent intercuspation and class I occlusion, were grouped into two controls ( n = 15) based on gender. The study casts were three-dimensional scanned to measure mesiodistal widths of all the teeth. The calculated anterior ratios (AR) and overall ratio (OR) were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance and t -tests. Results: There were no significant differences in “OR” and “AR” between the genders ( P > 0.05) and among the malocclusion and control subgroups ( P > 0.05). The mean “OR” (92.01 ± 0.18) and “AR” (78.60 ± 0.27) of the malocclusion group were significantly higher than that of Bolton's ratios ( P > 0.05). The “AR” of the control group was significantly higher than Bolton's standards ( P = 0.048). However, “OR” was no different ( P = 0.105). Malocclusion patients displayed a discrepancy (±2 standard deviation) in “AR” of 22.5% and 'OR' of 6.7% from Bolton's mean (BM). Similarly, the control group displayed a discrepancy in “AR” of 20% and “OR” of 10% from BM. Conclusion: The mean “OR” and “AR” of the Southern Saudi population showed no sexual dimorphism and no significant difference among various malocclusion and control subgroups. The “AR” of the malocclusion and control subgroups did not comply with Bolton's standards.