Background Mounting evidence has suggested the essential role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in a plethora of malignant tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the underlyling mechanisms of lncRNAs remain unidentified in HCC. The present work was aimed to explore the regulatory functions and mechanisms of LncRNA LNCAROD in HCC progression and chemotherapeutic response. Methods The expression of LNCAROD in HCC tissues and cell lines were detected by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qPCR). Cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and chemoresistance were evaluated by cell counting kit 8 (CCK8), colony formation, transwell, and chemosensitivity assays. Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation qRCR (MeRIP-qPCR) was used to determine N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification level. RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and RNA pull down were applied to identify the molecular sponge role of LNCAROD for modulation of miR-145-5p via the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) mechanism, as well as the interaction between LNCAROD and serine-and arginine-rich splicing factor 3 (SRSF3). The interaction between insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) and LNCAROD was also identified by RIP assay. Gain- or-loss-of-function assays were used to identify the function and underlying mechanisms of LNCAROD in HCC. Results We found that LNCAROD was significantly upregulated and predicted a poorer prognosis in HCC patients. LNCAROD upregulation was maintained by increased m6A methylation-mediated RNA stability. LNCAROD significantly promoted HCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and chemoresistance both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, mechanistic studies revealed that pyruvate kinase isoform M2 (PKM2)-mediated glycolysis enhancement is critical for the role of LNACROD in HCC. According to bioinformatics prediction and our experimental data, LNCAROD directly binds to SRSF3 to induce PKM switching towards PKM2 and maintains PKM2 levels in HCC by acting as a ceRNA against miR-145-5p. The oncogenic effects of LNCAROD in HCC were more prominent under hypoxia than normoxia due to the upregulation of hypoxia-triggered hypoxia-inducible factor 1α. Conclusions In summary, our present study suggests that LNCAROD induces PKM2 upregulation via simultaneously enhancing SRSF3-mediated PKM switching to PKM2 and sponging miR-145-5p to increase PKM2 level, eventually increasing cancer cell aerobic glycolysis to participate in tumor malignancy and chemoresistance, especially under hypoxic microenvironment. This study provides a promising diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for HCC patients.

Background Chemoresistance is a major factor contributing to the poor prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer, and cancer stemness is one of the most crucial factors associated with chemoresistance and a very promising direction for cancer treatment. However, the exact molecular mechanisms of cancer stemness have not been completely elucidated. Methods m6A-RNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing were used to screen m6A-related mRNAs and lncRNAs. qRT-PCR and FISH were utilized to analyse DDIT4-AS1 expression. Spheroid formation, colony formation, Western blot and flow cytometry assays were performed to analyse the cancer stemness and chemosensitivity of PDAC cells. Xenograft experiments were conducted to analyse the tumour formation ratio and growth in vivo. RNA sequencing, Western blot and bioinformatics analyses were used to identify the downstream pathway of DDIT4-AS1. IP, RIP and RNA pulldown assays were performed to test the interaction between DDIT4-AS1, DDIT4 and UPF1. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models were generated to evaluate chemosensitivities to GEM. Results DDIT4-AS1 was identified as one of the downstream targets of ALKBH5, and recruitment of HuR onto m6A-modified sites is essential for DDIT4-AS1 stabilization. DDIT4-AS1 was upregulated in PDAC and positively correlated with a poor prognosis. DDIT4-AS1 silencing inhibited stemness and enhanced chemosensitivity to GEM (Gemcitabine). Mechanistically, DDIT4-AS1 promoted the phosphorylation of UPF1 by preventing the binding of SMG5 and PP2A to UPF1, which decreased the stability of the DDIT4 mRNA and activated the mTOR pathway. Furthermore, suppression of DDIT4-AS1 in a PDX-derived model enhanced the antitumour effects of GEM on PDAC. Conclusions The ALKBH5-mediated m6A modification led to DDIT4-AS1 overexpression in PDAC, and DDIT-AS1 increased cancer stemness and suppressed chemosensitivity to GEM by destabilizing DDIT4 and activating the mTOR pathway. Approaches targeting DDIT4-AS1 and its pathway may be an effective strategy for the treatment of chemoresistance in PDAC.