The present evidence-based framework provides comprehensive advice on optimal perioperative care for the patient undergoing gastrectomy and facilitates multi-institutional prospective cohort registries and adequately powered randomized trials for further research.

Summary Many patients undergoing surgery for gastric carcinoma will develop peritoneal metastases. A method to identify those patients at risk of peritoneal recurrence would help in the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy. Peritoneal cytology has received little attention in the West, but may prove a useful additional means of evaluating patients with gastric cancer. The aims of this study were to evaluate sampling techniques for peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer, to assess the prognostic significance of free peritoneal malignant cells and to discover the effect of the operative procedure on dissemination of malignant cells. The study is based on 85 consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment of gastric cancer and followed up for 2 years or until death. Peritoneal cytology samples were collected at laparoscopy, and at operation prior to resection by intraperitoneal lavage and serosal brushings. After resection, samples were taken by peritoneal lavage, imprint cytology of the resected specimen and post-operatively by peritoneal irrigation via a percutaneous catheter. Malignant cells were diagnosed by two independent microscopists. Preoperative peritoneal lavage yielded malignant cells in 16 out of 85 cases (19%). The yield of free malignant cells was increased by using serosal brushings (by four cases) and imprint cytology (by two cases); all of the cases had evidence of serosal penetration. One serosa-negative case exhibited positive cytology in the post-resection peritoneal specimen in which the preresection cytology specimen was negative. Survival was worse in the cytology-positive group (χ 2 = 25.1; P < 0.0001). Among serosa-positive patients, survival was significantly reduced if cytology was positive, if cases yielded by brushings and imprint cytology were included (log-rank test = 8.44; 1 df, P = 0.004). In conclusion, free peritoneal malignant cells can be identified in patients with gastric cancer who have a poor prognosis; the yield can be increased with brushings and imprint cytology in addition to conventional peritoneal lavage. Evaluation of peritoneal cytology by these methods may have a role in the selection of patients with the poorest prognosis who may benefit most from adjuvant therapy.

BackgroundCough is a common, disabling symptom of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which may be exacerbated by acid reflux. Inhibiting gastric acid secretion could potentially reduce cough. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger, multicentre trial of omeprazole for cough in IPF, to assess safety and to quantify cough.MethodsSingle-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole (20 mg twice daily for 3 months) in patients with IPF. Primary objectives were to assess feasibility and acceptability of trial procedures. The primary clinical outcome was cough frequency.ResultsForty-five participants were randomised (23 to omeprazole, 22 to placebo), with 40 (20 in each group) having cough monitoring before and after treatment. 280 patients were screened to yield these numbers, with barriers to discontinuing antacids the single biggest reason for non-recruitment. Recruitment averaged 1.5 participants per month. Geometric mean cough frequency at the end of treatment, adjusted for baseline, was 39.1% lower (95% CI 66.0% lower to 9.3% higher) in the omeprazole group compared with placebo. Omeprazole was well tolerated and adverse event profiles were similar in both groups, although there was a small excess of lower respiratory tract infection and a small fall in forced expiratory volume and forced vital capacity associated with omeprazole.ConclusionsA large randomised controlled trial of PPIs for cough in IPF appears feasible and justified but should address barriers to randomisation and incorporate safety assessments in relation to respiratory infection and changes in lung function.

Knowledge of the pattern of recurrence of surgically treated cases of adenocarcinoma of the oesophago-gastric junction is important both for better understanding of their biological nature and for future strategic planning of therapy. The aim of this study is to demonstrate and compare the pattern of dissemination and recurrence in patients with Type I and Type II adenocarcinoma of oesophago-gastric junction. A prospective audit of the clinico-pathological features of patients who had undergone surgery with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of oesophago-gastric junction between 1991 and 1996 was undertaken. Patients were followed up by regular clinical examination. Clinical evaluation was supported by ultrasound, computerised tomography, radio-isotope bone scan, endoscopy and laparotomy each with biopsy and histology where appropriate. One hundred and sixty-nine patients with oesophago-gastric junction tumours (94 Type I and 75 Type II) have been followed up for a median of 75.3 (57 -133) months. One hundred and three patients developed proven recurrent disease. The median time to recurrence was 23.3 (14.2 -32.4) months for Type I and 20.5 (11.6 -29.4) for Type II cancers. The most frequent type of recurrence was haematogenous (56% of Type I recurrences and 54% of Type II) of which 56% were detected within 1 year of surgery. The most frequent sites were to liver (27%), bone (18%) brain (11%) and lung (11%). Local recurrence occurred in 33% of Type I cancer and 29% of Type II recurrences. Nodal recurrence occurred in 18 and 25% of Type I and Type II cancer recurrences, most frequently to coeliac or porta hepatis nodes (64%). Only 7% of Type I and 15% of Type II cancer recurrences were by peritoneal dissemination. Type I and Type II adenocarcinoma of the oesophago-gastric junction have a predominantly early, haematogenous pattern of recurrence. There is a need to better identify the group of patients with small metastases at the time of diagnosis who are destined to develop recurrent disease in order that they may be spared surgery and those with micro metastases in order that they can be offered multi-modality therapy including early post operative or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.