Well-differentiated liposarcoma/atypical lipomatous tumor and dedifferentiated liposarcoma can be difficult to distinguish from benign lipomatous neoplasms and other high-grade sarcomas, respectively. Cytogenetics in these tumors has identified ring and giant chromosomes composed of 12q13-15 amplicons including the MDM2 gene. Identifying MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization may prove an adjunctive tool in the diagnosis of lipomatous neoplasms. Dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization employing a laboratorydeveloped BAC label probe cocktail specific for MDM2 (12q15) and a probe for the centromeric region of chromosome 12 (Abbott Molecular, DesPlaines, IL) was performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue including whole sections from atypical lipomatous tumors (n ¼ 13), dedifferentiated liposarcomas (n ¼ 14), benign lipomatous tumors (n ¼ 30), and pleomorphic sarcoma, not otherwise specified (n ¼ 10), and a tissue microarray containing a variety of high-grade sarcomas (n ¼ 63). An MDM2/chromosome 12 ratio Z2.0 was considered amplified, o2.0 nonamplified, and cases displaying 42 signals of both probes and an MDM2 ratio o2.0 polysomic for chromosome 12. Of the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas, 100% showed amplification of MDM2. Chromosome 12 polysomy was noted in 89% of spindle cell/pleomorphic lipomas, while all angiolipomas and lipomas were nonamplified and eusomic. MDM2 amplification was observed in 40% of pleomorphic sarcomas and a small subset of high-grade sarcomas (3/63). MDM2/chromosome 12 fluorescence in situ hybridization is a sensitive and specific tool (both 100%) in evaluating low-grade lipomatous neoplasms. The specificity decreases in high-grade sarcomas, as MDM2 amplification was observed in a small portion of pleomorphic sarcomas and high-grade sarcomas other than dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Importantly, none of the benign lipomatous lesions were MDM2 amplified and even cells in areas of well-differentiated liposarcomas with minimal cytologic atypia were amplified, making the probe a valuable tool in the diagnosis of even limited biopsy samples of well-differentiated lipomatous neoplasms.

Well-differentiated liposarcoma/atypical lipomatous tumor can be difficult to differentiate from benign lipomatous tumors, especially on limited biopsy material. Adjunctive tests for MDM2 (murine double minute 2) have proven useful in whole-tissue sections; however, their utility has not been determined within the increasingly popular core needle biopsy. Herein, we compare the ability of MDM2 immunohistochemistry and MDM2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to discriminate benign lipomatous tumors from welldifferentiated liposarcoma on core needle biopsies. Well-differentiated liposarcoma (n ¼ 17) and an assortment of benign lipomatous tumors (n ¼ 37), which had concurrent or previous core needle biopsies, and resection specimens were subjected to both MDM2 immunohistochemistry and MDM2 FISH on both whole-tissue sections and corresponding core needle biopsy sections. Percentage tumor cells positive for MDM2 by immunohistochemistry and an MDM2:CEP12 FISH ratio was calculated in each biopsy and resection specimen pair and the results were compared. MDM2 FISH had a higher sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) compared with MDM2 immunohistochemistry (65 and 89%) in core needle biopsies, respectively. In addition, MDM2 immunohistochemistry had a false-positive rate of 11%, compared to 0% with FISH. The average MDM2:CEP12 ratio was similar in the biopsy material compared with the whole-tissue sections in both welldifferentiated liposarcoma and the benign lipomatous tumor group of neoplasms. Detection of MDM2 amplification by FISH is a more sensitive and specific adjunctive test than MDM2 immunohistochemistry to differentiate well-differentiated liposarcoma from various benign lipomatous tumors, especially on limited tissue samples.

Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma is a mesenchymal neoplasm of intermediate malignancy and uncertain histogenesis/line of differentiation, which occurs most commonly in the extremities of children to young adults. It has a characteristic appearance characterized by a proliferation of histiocytoid cells with a lymphoid cuff and fibrous pseudocapsule, simulating the appearance of a neoplasm occurring within a lymph node. However, these classic histological features are not always present. Given the variable appearance of the neoplastic cells and the lack of consistently positive immunohistochemical markers, diagnosis can be problematic. Angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma has been found to harbor three related translocations, a t(12;16)(q13;p11) resulting in a FUS/ATF1 fusion gene, t(12;22)(q13;q12) resulting in a EWSR1/ATF1 fusion, and t(2;22)(q33;q12) resulting in a EWSR1/CREB1 fusion. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes to EWSR1 and FUS, in theory, should detect all three translocations/gene fusions. We evaluated 18 cases of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma for rearrangements of EWSR1 and FUS by FISH, the largest series to date. We found that 13 of 17 (76%) cases of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma harbored rearrangements of EWSR1; rearrangements of FUS were not detected in any of the cases. This study affirms that the rearrangement of EWSR1 is a common genetic event in angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma, and is thus useful diagnostically. This study supports the fact that the rearrangement of FUS is present in only a small minority of angiomatoid fibrous histiocytomas. Interestingly, 24% of the cases were translocation negative, and did not contain rearrangements of EWSR1 or FUS by FISH. Although it is possible that these cases contained cryptic rearrangements of EWSR1 or FUS that were not detectable by our FISH probes, it also raises the possibility that another translocation/gene fusion may be present in angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Finally, we discuss some of the potential pitfalls of this technique, including confusion with other mesenchymal neoplasms containing rearrangement of EWSR1, in particular Ewing's sarcoma/PNET.