Up to 2 h of additional ablation of CFAEs after APVI does not appear to improve clinical outcomes in patients with long-lasting persistent AF.

Background-Segmental ostial catheter ablation (SOCA) to isolate the pulmonary veins (PVs) and left atrial catheter ablation (LACA) to encircle the PVs both may eliminate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). The relative efficacy of these 2 techniques has not been directly compared. Methods and Results-Of 80 consecutive patients with symptomatic PAF (age, 52Ϯ10 years), 40 patients underwent PV isolation by SOCA and 40 patients underwent LACA to encircle the PVs. During SOCA, ostial PV potentials recorded with a ring catheter were targeted. LACA was performed by encircling the left-and right-sided PVs 1 to 2 cm from the ostia and was guided by an electroanatomic mapping system; ablation lines also were created in the mitral isthmus and posterior left atrium. The mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were 156Ϯ45 and 50Ϯ17 minutes for SOCA and 149Ϯ33 and 39Ϯ12 minutes for LACA, respectively. At 6 months, 67% of patients who underwent SOCA and 88% of patients who underwent LACA were free of symptomatic PAF when not taking antiarrhythmic drug therapy (Pϭ0.02). Among the variables of age, sex, duration and frequency of PAF, ejection fraction, left atrial size, structural heart disease, and the ablation technique, only an increased left atrial size and the SOCA technique were independent predictors of recurrent PAF. The only complication was left atrial flutter in a patient who underwent LACA. Conclusions-In patients undergoing catheter ablation for PAF, LACA to encircle the PVs is more effective than SOCA.

No abstract

Background— Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a prevalent cardiovascular disorder that results in tissue ischemia which can progress to critical limb ischemia. Restoration of tissue perfusion in the setting of chronic ischemia through stimulation of arteriogenesis and angiogenesis remains a key therapeutic target for PAD. However, experimental therapeutics, including growth factor and gene therapy, have had little clinical success indicating the need for a better understanding of molecular pathways required for therapeutic angiogenesis. Methods and Results— Here we report that phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition by sildenafil significantly increases vascular perfusion, tissue blood flow, and vascular density during chronic ischemia of the mouse hind limb. Importantly, sildenafil therapy did not alter any of these parameters in nonischemic limbs. Sildenafil increased tissue cGMP levels independently of increases in nitric oxide production, and sildenafil therapy stimulated angiogenesis in ischemic limbs of eNOS −/− and iNOS −/− mice. Lastly, sildenafil-mediated angiogenic activity was blocked by inhibition of protein kinase G using the PKG antagonist DT-3. Conclusions— These data demonstrate that sildenafil therapy results in increased angiogenic activity through a PKG-dependent pathway that is independent of nitric oxide production or NOS activity and identify the angiogenic therapeutic potential of sildenafil for critical limb ischemia.