The prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in immigrant communities is unknown. Immigrants from south Asia are common in England and elsewhere, and the burden of viral hepatitis in these communities is unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence of viral hepatitis in immigrants from south Asia living in England, and we therefore undertook a community-based testing project in such people at five sites in England. A total of 4998 people attending community centres were screened for viral hepatitis using oral fluid testing. The overall prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) in people of south Asian origin was 1.6% but varied by country of birth being 0.4%, 0.2%, 0.6% and 2.7% in people of this ethnic group born in the UK, India, Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen was 1.2%-0.2%, 0.1%, 1.5% and 1.8% in people of this ethnic group born in the UK, India, Bangladesh and Pakistan, respectively. Analysis of risk factors for HCV infection shows that people from the Pakistani Punjab and those who have immigrated recently are at increased risk of infection. Our study suggests that migrants from Pakistan are at highest risk of viral hepatitis, with those from India at low risk. As prevalence varies both by country and region of origin and over time, the prevalence in migrant communities living in western countries cannot be easily predicted from studies in the country of origin.

We demonstrated diversity of chronic HBV infections in UK patients, suggesting that optimal management requires awareness of the variable patterns of chronic HBV in countries of origin. We also found less-than-optimal clinical management practices, possible gender-based treatment bias, and the need to improve testing for coinfections.

No abstract

NI‐0801 is a fully human monoclonal antibody against chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 10 (CXCL10), which is involved in the recruitment of inflammatory T cells into the liver. The safety and efficacy of NI‐0801 was assessed in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. In this open‐label phase 2a study, patients with primary biliary cholangitis with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid received six consecutive intravenous administrations of NI‐0801 (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. Patients were followed up for 3 months after the last infusion. Liver function tests, safety assessments, as well as pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were evaluated at different time points throughout the dosing period and the safety follow‐up period. Twenty‐nine patients were enrolled in the study and were treated with NI‐0801. The most frequently reported adverse events included headaches (52%), pruritus (34%), fatigue (24%), and diarrhea (21%). No study drug‐related serious adverse events were reported. NI‐0801 administration did not lead to a significant reduction in any of the liver function tests assessed at the end of the treatment period (i.e., 2 weeks after final NI‐0801 administration) compared to baseline. Conclusion: Despite clear pharmacologic responses in the blood, no therapeutic benefit of multiple administrations of NI‐0801 could be demonstrated. The high production rate of CXCL10 makes it difficult to achieve drug levels that lead to sustained neutralization of the chemokine, thus limiting its targetability. (Hepatology Communications 2018;2:492‐503)