Since its inception in the mid-1980s, the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) has undergone many changes but remains the largest validated and most utilised primary care database in the UK. Its use in pharmacoepidemiology stretches back many years with now over 800 original research papers. Administered by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency since 2001, the last 5 years have seen a rebuild of the database processing system enhancing access to the data, and a concomitant push towards broadening the applications of the database. New methodologies including real-world harm-benefit assessment, pharmacogenetic studies and pragmatic randomised controlled trials within the database are being implemented. A substantive and unique linkage program (using a trusted third party) has enabled access to secondary care data and disease-specific registry data as well as socio-economic data and death registration data. The utility of anonymised free text accessed in a safe and appropriate manner is being explored using simple and more complex techniques such as natural language processing.

ObjectivesThe optimal method of identifying people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from electronic primary care records is not known. We assessed the accuracy of different approaches using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a UK electronic health record database.Setting951 participants registered with a CPRD practice in the UK between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2012. Individuals were selected for ≥1 of 8 algorithms to identify people with COPD. General practitioners were sent a brief questionnaire and additional evidence to support a COPD diagnosis was requested. All information received was reviewed independently by two respiratory physicians whose opinion was taken as the gold standard.Primary outcome measureThe primary measure of accuracy was the positive predictive value (PPV), the proportion of people identified by each algorithm for whom COPD was confirmed.Results951 questionnaires were sent and 738 (78%) returned. After quality control, 696 (73.2%) patients were included in the final analysis. All four algorithms including a specific COPD diagnostic code performed well. Using a diagnostic code alone, the PPV was 86.5% (77.5–92.3%) while requiring a diagnosis plus spirometry plus specific medication; the PPV was slightly higher at 89.4% (80.7–94.5%) but reduced case numbers by 10%. Algorithms without specific diagnostic codes had low PPVs (range 12.2–44.4%).ConclusionsPatients with COPD can be accurately identified from UK primary care records using specific diagnostic codes. Requiring spirometry or COPD medications only marginally improved accuracy. The high accuracy applies since the introduction of an incentivised disease register for COPD as part of Quality and Outcomes Framework in 2004.

Background: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is delivered continuously via intrajejunal percutaneous gastrostomy tube. Objective: To examine long-term safety, efficacy and quality of life of LCIG in an open-label extension study. Methods: Patients received 52 weeks of open-label LCIG treatment following a 12-week double-blind, double-dummy trial in which they were randomized to either LCIG or immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa. Patient cohort designation was by receipt of LCIG in the preceding trial randomization (continuing-LCIG vs. LCIG-naïve patients). Results: Sixty-two of 66 subjects in the double-blind proceeded to the open-label extension. Most subjects (95%) reported ≥1 adverse event (AE); only 3 subjects (4.8%) discontinued due to AEs. AE incidence declined gradually over 52 weeks. Serious AEs were reported by 23%. LCIG-naïve patients (N = 29) showed a decrease in "Off" time and an increase in "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia (change from baseline to final visit in mean [SD] hours = −2.34 [2.78] P < 0.001 and 2.19 [3.70] P = 0.005, respectively), while continuing-LCIG patients (N = 33) showed sustained "Off" time duration and further improvement in "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia (−0.42 [2.67] P = 0.377 and 1.00 [2.58] P = 0.036, respectively). The majority of patients in both groups (LCIG-naïve, continuing-LCIG, respectively) were rated 'Much Improved' or 'Very Much Improved' at final visit on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (69.0%, 69.7%). Conclusions: Continuing-LCIG patients continued to derive benefit from LCIG while the magnitude of improvement among LCIG-naïve patients was similar to that observed for patients on LCIG in the preceding double-blind study. The overall AE profile was consistent with previous phase 3 clinical trials involving the LCIG system.

A BST RACT : Background: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (designated as carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension in the United States) provides stable plasma levodopa concentrations and reduces motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease patients through continuous delivery of levodopa via percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy. We report long-term safety and efficacy outcomes from an open-label phase 3 treatment program. Methods: PD patients (n 5 262) who completed a 12-week double-blind study and its 52-week open-label extension or a separate 54-week open-label study were enrolled in this ongoing phase 3 open-label, multinational study (NCT00660673). Safety and efficacy assessments were collected every 6 months. Results: Mean total duration of exposure to levodopacarbidopa intestinal gel was 4.1 years (range, 1.2 to 6.9 years). The overall discontinuation rate was 34% (average annual discontinuation rate, 10%). Although most patients (94%) reported an adverse event, the rate of adverse events decreased over time; 53% experienced a serious adverse event. Of patients in this extension study, 54% required jejunal tube replacement during the study, and 37% required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube replacement. Most patients were on levodopa monotherapy. Patients maintained reductions in "off" time and increases in mean "on" time without dyskinesia from initial levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion to he study end point (P < 0.001; n 5 81). Activities of daily living and quality-of-life assessments demonstrated significant improvements that persisted through the study. Conclusions: This long-term study demonstrates sustained and clinically meaningful benefits from levodopacarbidopa intestinal gel in advanced PD patients.--

BackgroundContinuous administration of levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel (carbidopa‐levodopa enteral suspension) through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy is a treatment option for advanced Parkinson disease (PD) patients with motor fluctuations resistant to standard oral medications. Safety data from 4 prospective studies were integrated to assess the safety of this therapy.MethodsSafety data from 4 studies were summarized using 2 overlapping data sets, permitting the separation of procedure/device–associated (n = 395) from non‐procedure/device adverse events (n = 412).ResultsAt the data cutoff, median exposure to levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel was 911 days (range, 1‐1980 days) with 963 total patient‐years of exposure. Procedure/device adverse events occurred in 300 patients (76%), and serious adverse events occurred in 68 (17%); most frequently reported procedure/device adverse events and serious adverse events were complications of device insertion (41% and 8%, respectively) and abdominal pain (36% and 4%, respectively). Non‐procedure/device adverse events occurred in 92% (379), with most frequently reported being insomnia (23%) and falls (23%); 42% (171) had non‐procedure/device serious adverse events, with most frequently reported being pneumonia (5%) and PD symptoms (2%). Adverse events led to discontinuation in 17% (72), most frequently because of complication of device insertion (2.4%). There were 34 treatment‐emergent deaths (8.3%) in the overlapping data sets, 2 of which (0.5%) were considered “possibly related” to the treatment system.ConclusionIn the largest collection of levodopa‐carbidopa intestinal gel safety data from prospective clinical studies, procedure/device events were frequently reported and occasionally life threatening. Most non‐procedure/device events were typical for levodopa treatment and an elderly population. These factors combined with high treatment efficacy led to a relatively low discontinuation rate in advanced PD patients. © 2015 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society