Background: The detection of additional autoantibodies is of great concern in systemic sclerosis (SSc) when those included in the ACR/EULAR classification are negative. In this context, the interest of antifibrillarin (anti-U3RNP) autoantibodies (AFAs) in the routine evaluation of SSc remains unclear. We aimed to assess the relevance of AFAs and their clinical association in SSc patients. Methods: In a multicenter observational retrospective study, we collected immunological and clinical data associated with AFA positivity in SSc (n = 42) and non-SSc patients (n = 13). Patients with SSc negative for AFAs (n = 83) were considered as a control group. AFAs were detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using HEp-2 cells, EliA or immunoblot techniques. Results: We confirmed a typical nuclear IIF pattern and showed that AFAs are mostly exclusive towards SSc conventional autoantibodies. Although also observed in non-SSc patients, high levels of AFAs with the ELiA technique allowed the diagnosis of SSc. Compared to AFA-negative SSc patients, AFA-positive SSc patients more frequently exhibited visceral involvements. They more frequently suffered from the diffuse cutaneous form and had a higher global severity of the disease. Conclusions: We demonstrate the usefulness of quantifying AFAs in the immunological exploration of SSc, especially when patients are seronegative for SSc conventional autoantibodies and display a typical IIF pattern. AFAs might constitute an interesting marker of SSc severity.

Objectives Assessment of the adaptive immune response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is crucial for studying long‐term immunity and vaccine strategies. We quantified IFNγ‐secreting T cells reactive against the main viral SARS‐CoV‐2 antigens using a standardised enzyme‐linked immunospot assay (ELISpot). Methods Overlapping peptide pools built from the sequences of M, N and S viral proteins and a mix (MNS) were used as antigens. Using IFNγ T‐CoV‐Spot assay, we assessed T‐cell and antibody responses in mild, moderate and severe SARS‐CoV‐2 patients and in control samples collected before the outbreak. Results Specific T cells were assessed in 60 consecutive patients (mild, n = 26; moderate, n = 10; and severe patients, n = 24) during their follow‐up (median time from symptom onset [interquartile range]: 36 days [28;53]). T cells against M, N and S peptide pools were detected in n = 60 (100%), n = 56 (93.3%), n = 55 patients (91.7%), respectively. Using the MNS mix, IFNγ T‐CoV‐Spot assay showed a specificity of 96.7% (95% CI, 88.5–99.6%) and a specificity of 90.3% (75.2–98.0%). The frequency of reactive T cells observed with M, S and MNS mix pools correlated with severity and with levels of anti‐S1 and anti‐RBD serum antibodies. Conclusion IFNγ T‐CoV‐Spot assay is a reliable method to explore specific T cells in large cohorts of patients. This test may become a useful tool to assess the long‐lived memory T‐cell response after vaccination. Our study demonstrates that SARS‐CoV‐2 patients developing a severe disease achieve a higher adaptive immune response.