No abstract

IMPORTANCE Transferring patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to hospitals not providing interventional treatment options is an unresolved medical problem. OBJECTIVE To determine how optimized prehospital management (OPM) based on use of the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) compares with management in a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) in accurately triaging patients to the appropriate hospital with (comprehensive stroke center [CSC]) or without (primary stroke center [PSC]) interventional treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized multicenter trial with 3-month follow-up, patients were assigned week-wise to one of the pathways between June 15, 2015, and November 15, 2017, in 2 regions of Saarland, Germany; 708 of 824 suspected stroke patients did not meet inclusion criteria, resulting in a study population of 116 adult patients. INTERVENTIONS Patients received either OPM based on a standard operating procedure that included the use of the LAMS (cut point Ն4) or management in an MSU (an ambulance with vascular imaging, point-of-care laboratory, and telecommunication capabilities). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary end point was the proportion of patients accurately triaged to either CSCs (LVO, ICH) or PSCs (others).RESULTS A predefined interim analysis was performed after 116 patients of the planned 232 patients had been enrolled. Of these, 53 were included in the OPM group (67.9% women; mean [SD] age, 74 [11] years) and 63 in the MSU group (57.1% women; mean [SD] age, 75 [11] years). The primary end point, an accurate triage decision, was reached for 37 of 53 patients (69.8%) in the OPM group and for 63 of 63 patients (100%) in the MSU group (difference, 30.2%; 95% CI, 17.8%-42.5%; P < .001). Whereas 7 of 17 OPM patients (41.2%) with LVO or ICH required secondary transfers from a PSC to a CSC, none of the 11 MSU patients (0%) required such transfers (difference, 41.2%; 95% CI, 17.8%-64.6%; P = .02). The LAMS at a cut point of 4 or higher led to an accurate diagnosis of LVO or ICH for 13 of 17 patients (76.5%; 6 triaged to a CSC) and of LVO selectively for 7 of 9 patients (77.8%; 2 triaged to a CSC). Stroke management metrics were better in the MSU group, although patient outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEWhereas prehospital management optimized by LAMS allows accurate triage decisions for approximately 70% of patients, MSU-based management enables accurate triage decisions for 100%. Depending on the specific health care environment considered, both approaches are potentially valuable in triaging stroke patients.

BackgroundEarly treatment with rt-PA is critical for favorable outcome of acute stroke. However, only a very small proportion of stroke patients receive this treatment, as most arrive at hospital too late to be eligible for rt-PA therapy.Methods and FindingsWe developed a “Mobile Stroke Unit”, consisting of an ambulance equipped with computed tomography, a point-of-care laboratory system for complete stroke laboratory work-up, and telemedicine capabilities for contact with hospital experts, to achieve delivery of etiology-specific and guideline-adherent stroke treatment at the site of the emergency, well before arrival at the hospital. In a departure from current practice, stroke patients could be differentially treated according to their ischemic or hemorrhagic etiology even in the prehospital phase of stroke management. Immediate diagnosis of cerebral ischemia and exclusion of thrombolysis contraindications enabled us to perform prehospital rt-PA thrombolysis as bridging to later intra-arterial recanalization in one patient. In a complementary patient with cerebral hemorrhage, prehospital diagnosis allowed immediate initiation of hemorrhage-specific blood pressure management and telemedicine consultation regarding surgery. Call-to-therapy-decision times were 35 minutes.ConclusionThis preliminary study proves the feasibility of guideline-adherent, etiology-specific and causal treatment of acute stroke directly at the emergency site.

In Germany the emergency medical services, which include dispatching emergency physicians to the scene, are considered to be among the best in the world. However, the hospitals admitting these patients still report shortcomings in prehospital care. The quality of an emergency medical service depends on both formal qualification and experience in managing such emergencies. Therefore, we determined how frequently emergency medical service physicians in Germany actually encountered complex and demanding emergency situations outside the hospital and how often they had to carry out emergency interventions. We therefore evaluated data from more than 82,000 ground emergency medical service scene calls registered in the MIND ("minimaler Notarztdatensatz") data base of the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany and more than 47,000 helicopter emergency medical service scene calls from the "Luftrettungs-, Informations- und Kommunikationssystem" (LIKS) data base of the German ADAC air rescue service. The results, which were unexpectedly distinct, impressively demonstrate that in part emergency medical service staff only encountered some emergencies very rarely. In particular, patients with life-threatening conditions such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, head trauma, as well as multiple trauma were only treated once every 0.4-14.5 months and cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation were only carried out once every 0.5-1.5 months. Furthermore, a time period of 6 months to more than 6 years may pass before a chest tube has to be placed. There are, of course, considerable differences between ground and helicopter emergency medical services. Particularly in areas where the frequency of such emergency cases is low, the clinical experience required to competently manage a demanding emergency situation cannot be gained or maintained just by working in the emergency medical system. As a result of the general pressure to cut costs and also of changes in hospital politics, however, only highly qualified and experienced emergency medical services may survive in Germany in the long term. In addition to formal qualifications and accompanying practice-related courses, future emergency medical service personnel should be drafted from clinical department staff that are experienced in treating severely ill and severely injured patients.