No abstract

Summary This study set out to evaluate, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma, the efficacy and toxicity of S-1, which contains tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate, based on a biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) targeted at inhibition of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Sixty-three patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were enrolled into the study. None of the patients had received prior chemotherapy except for adjuvant setting. S-1 was administered orally twice daily at a standard dose of 80 mg m -2 day -1 for 28 days followed by a 14-day rest. This agent is continued until disease progression, unaccepted toxicity, or patient refusal. Twenty-two (35%) of the 62 eligible patients achieved PR with a 95% confidence interval of 25-48%. Five of the 10 patients with a history of adjuvant chemotherapy achieved partial remission. The median survival time was 12 months. Major adverse reactions included myelosuppressive and gastrointestinal toxicities, though their incidence of grade 3 or 4 being 13% in neutropenia and less than 10% in the others. None of the 53 patients treated as outpatients required hospitalization due to adverse reactions: These results suggest that S-1 achieves similar responses to those of infusional 5-FU plus leucovorin and shows the potential of another biochemical modulation with easily manageable toxicity.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or a 5-FU derivative 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (FT) has been widely prescribed for patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, the phosphorylation of 5-FU in the digestive tract causes gastrointestinal toxicities. 5-FU is also rapidly degraded to α-fluoro-β-alanine after contact with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPDase) which is mainly present in the liver. Therefore, to overcome these metabolic events, S-1, an antitumor agent was developed, based on the biochemical modulation of FT by 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) and potassium oxonate (Oxo), in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. The antineoplastic effect of S-1, was examined in Japanese patients with advanced gastric (G) or colorectal (C) cancer in a multicenter early phase II study involving 24 centers throughout Japan. The patients were prescribed a minimum of 2 courses of S-1 orally, with each course consisting of 75 or 50 mg (in terms of FT) twice a day for 28 days followed by withdrawal for 2 weeks. Thirty-one patients with G and 31 C were entered into this study. The clinical response and extent of toxicity were evaluated in G 28 and C 30 cases, respectively. Nine (32.1%) G patients and 14 (46.7%) C patients had been treated previously with other anticancer drugs. In G patients, there was a 53.6% (15/28) and in C patients a 16.7% (5/30) response rate (90% confidence interval G 38.4–68.1% and C 8.4–30.5%) with 15 (53.6%) (G) and 5 (16.7%) (C) partial responses (PR), and these responses persisted for 79 days (G) and 120 days (C) (median value). In particular, the response rate for the primary lesion was 27.8% (5/18) (G) and 33.3% (1/3) (C). No change (NC) in the disease was observed in 4 (14.3%) (G) and 13 (43.3%) (C) patients, and in 6 (21.4%) (G) and 7 (23.3%) (C) the disease progressed (PD). At the time of analysis, the median survival was 298 days (G) and 358 days (C). Major adverse effects consisted of gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression while toxicities of grade 3 or more occurred in 35.7% (10/28) (G) and 33.3% (10/30) (C). Based on these data, S-1 is considered to have positive effects in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

Purpose: YM155, a novel molecular targeted agent, suppresses survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family that is overexpressed in many tumor types. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of YM155 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced refractory solid tumors were treated with escalating doses of YM155 administered by continuous i.v. infusion for 168 hours in 21-day cycles. Results: Of the 34 patients enrolled, 33 (median age, 59 years) received at least 1 dose of YM155 (range, 1-19 cycles). The dose levels studied were 1.8, 3.6, 4.8, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.6 mg/m 2 /d. The MTD was determined to be 8.0 mg/m 2 /d, based on a dose-limiting toxicity of increased blood creatinine observed in 2 patients receiving 10.6 mg/m 2 /d. The most common adverse reactions judged to be related to YM155 were urine microalbumin present; fever; injection-site phlebitis; fatigue; and decreased hemoglobin/ anemia, blood albumin, and lymphocyte count. The pharmacokinetic profile was almost linear over the dosing range and was similar between cycles 1 and 2. Urinary excretion of YM155 showed no definite difference among doses. Stable disease was achieved in nine patients. Conclusions: YM155 was safely administered to patients with advanced refractory solid tumors by 168-hour continuous i.v. infusion in 21-day cycles. The MTD was determined to be 8.0 mg/m 2 /d. The safety profile, plasma concentrations achieved, and antitumor activity observed merit further studies with this survivin suppressant, alone and in combination regimens.

CPT-11 showed promising antitumor activity against metastatic colorectal cancer that was resistant to prior therapy. Further clinical trials of combination chemotherapy using CPT-11 are justified.