Summary Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a frequent indication for lung transplantation (LTX) with pulmonary hypertension (PH) negatively affecting outcome. The optimal procedure type remains a debated topic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pretransplant PH in IPF patients. Single LTX (SLTX, n = 46) was the standard procedure type. Double LTX (DLTX, n = 30) was only performed in cases of relevant PH or additional suppurative lung disease. There was no significant difference for pretransplant clinical parameters. Preoperative mean pulmonary arterial pressure was significantly higher in DLTX recipients (22.7 ± 0.8 mmHg vs. 35.9 ± 1.8 mmHg, P < 0.001). After transplantation, 6‐min‐walk distance and BEST‐FEV1 were significantly higher for DLTX patients (6‐MWD: 410 ± 25 m vs. 498 ± 23 m, P = 0.02; BEST‐FEV1: 71.2 ± 3.0 (% pred) vs. 86.2 ± 4.2 (% pred), P = 0.004). Double LTX recipients demonstrated a significantly better 1‐year‐, overall‐ and Bronchiolitis obliterans Syndrome (BOS)‐free survival (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis confirmed SLTX to be a significant predictor for death and BOS. Single LTX offers acceptable survival rates for IPF patients. Double LTX provides a significant benefit in selected recipients. Our data warrant further trials of SLTX versus DLTX stratifying for potential confounders including PH.

No abstract

The aim of this study was to assess fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) for the early diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) after lung transplantation (LTX). 611 FeNO measurements in 166 consecutive patients were classified depending on BOS stage at the time of assessment and course during minimum follow-up of 3 months: (1) stable non-BOS, (2) unstable non-BOS, (3) stable BOS and (4) unstable BOS. Unstable course was defined as new onset of BOS≥1 or progression of BOS. FeNO before unstable course was significantly increased in comparison to their stable counterparts (non-BOS: 28.9 ± 1.2 ppb, n = 40 vs. 16.4 ± 0.8 ppb, n = 131 and BOS: 32.5 ± 1.3 ppb, n = 35 vs. 15.3 ± 0.8 ppb, n = 26; p = 0.01 each). Average time from FeNO reading to onset of deterioration was 117 ± 9 days in non-BOS and 136 ± 9 days in BOS patients. The positive and negative predictive value of FeNO >20 ppb for BOS was 69.0% and 96.9%, respectively. Serial measurements demonstrated significantly lower mean individual variation in stable recipients as compared to stable patients switching to unstable course (3.2 ± 0.3 ppb vs. 12.7 ± 1.4 ppb, p = 0.02). In particular, the excellent negative predictive value of persistently low FeNO readings for future BOS make FeNO assessments a useful tool for continuous risk stratification after LTX.

Our data suggest that treatment with PDE-5 inhibitors improves pulmonary haemodynamic patients with PH secondary to ILD.

BackgroundLymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare lung disease characterised by progressive airflow obstruction. No effective medical treatment is available but therapy with sirolimus has shown some promise. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate sirolimus in progressive LAM.MethodsSirolimus (trough level 5 - 10 ng/ml) was administered to ten female patients (42.4 ± 11.9 years) with documented progression. Serial pulmonary function tests and six-minute-walk-distance (6-MWD) assessments were performed.ResultsThe mean loss of FEV1 was -2.30 ± 0.52 ml/day before therapy and a significant mean gain of FEV1 of 1.19 ± 0.26 ml/day was detected during treatment (p = 0.001). Mean FEV1 and FVC at baseline were 1.12 ± 0.15 l (36.1 ± 4.5%pred.) and 2.47 ± 0.25 l (69.2 ± 6.5%pred.), respectively. At three and six months during follow-up a significant increase of FEV1 and FVC was demonstrated (3 months ΔFEV1: 220 ± 82 ml, p = 0.024; 6 months ΔFEV1: 345 ± 58 ml, p = 0.001); (3 months ΔFVC: 360 ± 141 ml, p = 0.031; 6 months ΔFVC: 488 ± 138 ml, p = 0.006). Sirolimus was discontinued in 3 patients because of serious recurrent lower respiratory tract infection or sirolimus-induced pneumonitis. No deaths and no pneumothoraces occurred during therapy.ConclusionsOur data suggest that sirolimus might be considered as a therapeutic option in rapidly declining LAM patients. However, sirolimus administration may be associated with severe respiratory adverse events requiring treatment cessation in some patients. Moreover, discontinuation of sirolimus is mandatory prior to lung transplantation.