BackgroundEndothelial dysfunction is an independent predictor for cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Glucagon like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) reportedly exerts vasodilatory actions, and inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 (DPP‐4), an enzyme‐degrading GLP‐1, are widely used to treat T2DM. We therefore hypothesized that DPP‐4 inhibitors (DPP‐4Is) improve endothelial function in T2DM patients and performed 2 prospective, randomized crossover trials to compare the DPP‐4I sitagliptin and an α‐glucosidase inhibitor, voglibose (in study 1) and the DPP‐4Is sitagliptin and alogliptin (in study 2).Methods and ResultsIn study 1, 24 men with T2DM (46±5 years) were randomized to sitagliptin or voglibose for 6 weeks without washout periods. Surprisingly, sitagliptin significantly reduced flow‐mediated vasodilatation (FMD; −51% compared with baseline, P<0.05) of the brachial artery despite improved diabetic status. In contrast, voglibose did not affect FMD. To confirm this result and determine whether it is a class effect, we conducted another trial (study 2) to compare sitagliptin and alogliptin in 42 T2DM patients (66±8 years) for 6 weeks with 4‐week washout periods. Both DPP‐4Is improved glycemic control but significantly attenuated FMD (7.2/4.3%, P<0.001, before/after sitagliptin; 7.0/4.8%, P<0.001, before/after alogliptin, respectively). Interestingly, FMD reduction was less evident in subjects who were on statins or whose LDL cholesterol levels were reduced by them, but this was not correlated with parameters including DPP‐4 activity and GLP‐1 levels or diabetic parameters.ConclusionsOur 2 independent trials demonstrated that DPP‐4 inhibition attenuated endothelial function as evaluated by FMD in T2DM patients. This unexpected unfavorable effect may be a class effect of DPP‐4Is.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: http://center.umin.ac.jp, Unique Identifiers: UMIN000005682 (sitagliptin versus voglibose) and UMIN000005681 (sitagliptin versus alogliptin).

No abstract

Objective-ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and ABCG1 are key molecules in an initial step of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), a major antiatherogenic property of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The ubiquitinproteasome system (UPS) mediates nonlysosomal pathways for protein degradation and is known to be involved in atherosclerosis. However, little is known about the effects of the UPS on these molecules and overall RCT. We therefore investigated whether UPS inhibition affects ABCA1/G1 expression in macrophages and RCT in vitro and in vivo. Methods and Results-Various proteasome inhibitors increased ABCA1/G1 expression in macrophages, translating into enhanced apolipoprotein A-I-and HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux from macrophages. ABCA1 and ABCG1 were found to undergo polyubiquitination in the macrophages and HEK293 cells overexpressing these proteins, and pulse-chase analysis revealed that proteasome inhibitors inhibited ABCA1/G1 protein degradation. In in vivo experiments, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib increased ABCA1/G1 protein levels in mouse peritoneal macrophages, and RCT assays showed that it significantly increased the fecal (54% increase compared with saline) and plasma (23%) appearances of the tracer derived from intraperitoneally injected 3 H-cholesterol-labeled macrophages. Conclusion-The present study provided evidence that the UPS is involved in ABCA1/G1 degradation, thereby affecting RCT in vivo. Therefore, specific inhibition of the UPS pathway might lead to a novel HDL therapy that enhances RCT. Key Words: ABC Transporter Ⅲ Macrophages Ⅲ HDL Ⅲ reverse cholesterol transport Ⅲ ubiquitin-proteasome system H igh-density lipoprotein (HDL) removes cholesterol pathologically accumulated in atherosclerotic lesion macrophages and transports it back to the liver for subsequent conversion to bile in a process called reverse cholesterol transport (RCT). 1,2 ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and ABCG1 play essential roles in cholesterol efflux from macrophages and HDL formation by acting in a sequential manner: ABCA1 generates nascent HDL particles from lipid-poor apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), 3 which then facilitate cholesterol efflux via ABCG1, followed by formation of mature HDL particles. 4 Deletion of both ABCA1 and ABCG1 in macrophages reportedly accelerated atherosclerotic legion development as compared with deletion of either ABCA1 or ABCG1, 5 indicating that ABCA1 and ABCG1 have a synergetic role in antiatherogenesis. See accompanying article on page 1939Evidence regarding the regulation of ABCA1/G1 expression, such as via transactivation by ligand-activated liver X receptor/retinoid X receptor heterodimer, 6 has been accumulating. ABCA1 and ABCG1 have been emerging as therapeutic targets for the treatment of atherosclerotic diseases because enhancement of their expression can promote RCT by increasing cholesterol efflux from macrophages and raising HDL levels. However, strategies using liver X receptor ligands suffer from major drawbacks, including development of fat...

Summary ATP-binding cassette transporters (ABC) A1 and G1 are key molecules in cholesterol efflux from macrophages, which is an initial step of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), a major anti-atherogenic property of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Astaxanthin is one of the naturally occurring carotenoids responsible for the pink-red pigmentation in a variety of living organisms. Although astaxanthin is known to be a strong antioxidant, it remains unclear through what mechanism of action it affects cholesterol homeostasis in macrophages. We therefore investigated the effects of astaxanthin on cholesterol efflux and ABCA1/G1 expressions in macrophages. Astaxanthin enhanced both apolipoprotein (apo) A-I-and HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux from RAW264.7 cells. In supporting these enhanced cholesterol efflux mechanisms, astaxanthin promoted ABCA1/G1 expression in various macrophages. In contrast, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ␥ , liver X receptor (LXR) ␣ and LXR ␤ levels remained unchanged by astaxanthin. An experiment using actinomycin D demonstrated that astaxanthin transcriptionally induced ABCA1/G1 expression, and oxysterol depletion caused by overexpression of cholesterol sulfotransferase further revealed that these inductions in ABCA1/G1 were independent of LXR-mediated pathways. Finally, we performed luciferase assays using human ABCA1/G1 promoterreporter constructs to reveal that astaxanthin activated both promoters irrespective of the presence or absence of LXR-responsive elements, indicating LXR-independence of these activations. In conclusion, astaxanthin increased ABCA1/G1 expression, thereby enhancing apoA-I/HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux from the macrophages in an LXR-independent manner. In addition to the anti-oxidative properties, the potential cardioprotective properties of astaxanthin might therefore be associated with an enhanced anti-atherogenic function of HDL.

Endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension is an independent predictor for future cardiovascular events. Although inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reportedly improves endothelial function through its effects on oxidative stress and inflammation, questions remain regarding the factors that are pivotal for improvement of endothelial function by RAS inhibition. We therefore performed a prospective, randomized crossover trial in which an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, olmesartan and calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, were compared in 31 essential hypertensive patients. Results showed that, although both treatments achieved comparable lowering of blood pressure (BP), olmesartan, but not amlodipine, significantly improved endothelial function as evaluated by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery. Although no significant changes in diabetic and lipid parameters were observed with either drug, olmesartan slightly decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate, which, surprisingly, translated into decreased microalbuminuria. In a similar vein, olmesartan reduced serum C-reactive protein and increased urine antioxidant levels compared with baseline, and reduced urine 8-epi-prostaglandin F2a levels compared with both baseline and amlodipine. Finally, although overall changes in plasma extracellular superoxide dismutase (EC-SOD) levels were not modulated by either treatment, for olmesartan there was a positive correlation between changes in FMD and those in EC-SOD levels. In conclusion, olmesartan improved endothelial function in hypertensive patients independent of its BP-lowering effect, which was due, at least in part, to its antioxidative property. Therefore, olmesartan might provide a greater long-term benefit for hypertensive patients with impaired endothelial function than amlodipine.