Background Return-to-sport protocols after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) often include assessment of hop distance symmetry. However, it is unclear whether movement deficits are present, regardless of hop symmetry. Objectives To assess biomechanics and symmetry of adolescent athletes following ACLR during a single-leg hop for distance. Methods Forty-six patients with ACLR (5-12 months post surgery; 27 female; mean ± SD age, 15.6 ± 1.7 years) were classified as asymmetric (operative-limb hop distance less than 90% that of nonoperative limb [n = 17]) or symmetric (n = 29) in this retrospective cohort. Lower extremity biomechanics were compared among operative and contralateral limbs and 24 symmetric controls (12 female; mean ± SD age, 14.7 ± 1.5 years) using analysis of variance. Results Compared to controls, asymmetric patients hopped a shorter distance on their operative limb (P<.001), while symmetric patients hopped an intermediate distance on both sides (P≥.12). During landing, the operative limb, regardless of hop distance, exhibited lower knee flexion moments compared to controls and the contralateral side (P≤.04), with lower knee energy absorption than the contralateral side (P≤.006). During takeoff, both symmetric and asymmetric patients had less hip extension and smaller ankle range of motion on the operative side compared with controls (P≤.05). Asymmetric patients also had lower hip range of motion on the operative, compared with the contralateral, side (P = .001). Conclusion Both symmetric and asymmetric patients offloaded the operative knee; symmetric patients achieved symmetry, in part, by hopping a shorter distance on the contralateral side. Therefore, hop distance symmetry may not be an adequate test of single-limb function and return-to-sport readiness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(8):622-629. Epub 30 Mar 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7817.
Background:Parents of young athletes play a major role in the identification and management of sports-related concussions. However, they are often unaware of the consequences of concussions and recommended management techniques.Hypothesis:This study quantitatively assessed parental understanding of concussions to identify specific populations in need of additional education. We predicted that parents with increased education and prior sports- and concussion-related experience would have more knowledge and safer attitudes toward concussions.Study Design:Cross-sectional survey.Level of Evidence:Level 5.Methods:Participants were parents of children brought to a pediatric hospital and 4 satellite clinics for evaluation of orthopaedic injuries. Participants completed a validated questionnaire that assessed knowledge of concussion symptoms, attitudes regarding diagnosis and return-to-play guidelines, and previous sports- and concussion-related experience.Results:Over 8 months, 214 parents completed surveys. Participants scored an average of 18.4 (possible, 0-25) on the Concussion Knowledge Index and 63.1 (possible, 15-75) on the Concussion Attitude Index. Attitudes were safest among white women, and knowledge increased with income and education levels. Previous sports experience did not affect knowledge or attitudes, but parents who reported experiencing an undiagnosed concussion had significantly better concussion knowledge than those who did not.Conclusion:Parents with low income and education levels may benefit from additional concussion-related education.Clinical Relevance:There exist many opportunities for improvement in parental knowledge and attitudes about pediatric sports-related concussions. Ongoing efforts to understand parental knowledge of concussions will inform the development of a strategic and tailored approach to the prevention and management of pediatric concussions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.