Purpose: This prospective study extending for >3 years had two objectives: (a) to use Doppler ultrasonography (US) to estimate the incidence of asymptomatic catheter‐related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a large population and (b) to study the effect of the catheter position as an individual risk factor for catheter‐related DVT. Materials and Methods: Between October 1995 and June 1998, a total of 145 patients who had oropharyngeal tract cancer and who were fitted with the same totally implantable central venous catheters (CVCs) were included in the study. Follow‐up included (a) estimation of the position of each catheter tip on a chest radiograph obtained immediately after surgery and (b) regular monthly Doppler US screening for catheter‐related DVT. Results: Seventeen patients developed catheter‐related DVT; 13 of them were asymptomatic. The mean interval between CVC implantation and detection of thrombosis was 42.2 days. Correct positioning of the distal catheter tip was associated with a significantly lower rate of catheter‐related DVT. Only five of 87 patients with a correctly positioned distal catheter tip (ie, either in the superior vena cava or at the junction between the right atrium and the superior vena cava) developed thrombosis, compared with 12 of 26 patients with a misplaced catheter (p < .001). The side on which the CVC was implanted did not influence the catheter‐related DVT rate. Conclusion: The rate of asymptomatic catheter‐related DVT is high and could be lowered with correct initial CVC positioning.
The rate of asymptomatic catheter-related DVT is high and could be lowered with correct initial CVC positioning.
Background. Vertical partial laryngectomy (VPL) and radiation therapy (RT) are the recommended conventional conservative options for glottic carcinoma classified as T2. In series presenting more than 100 patients with a minimum 3‐year follow‐up, however, local recurrence rates were reported as 22‐43.5%. The authors' experience with a new strategy based on continuous cisplatin‐fluorouracil induction chemotherapy (IC) and supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoepiglottopexy (CHEP) is presented. Methods. A retrospective analysis of 67 patients who presented with untreated moderately to well differentiated invasive glottic carcinoma classified as T2, managed from 1983 to 1991 with IC and CHEP, was conducted. Statistical analysis of survival, local control, nodal control, distant metastasis, and metachronous second primary tumor incidence was based on the Kaplan‐Meier actuarial method. Univariate analysis was performed to analyze the relationships between various factors and survival, local recurrence, and nodal recurrence. Clinical response, histologic response, IC toxicity and postoperative course were reported. Results. The Kaplan‐Meier 5‐year survival, local recurrence, nodal recurrence, distant metastasis, and metachronous second primary tumor estimate were 92.3%, 5.6%, 1.5%, 1.8%, and 5.6%, respectively. Overall laryngeal preservation was achieved in 65 patients (97%). Ultimate local control was achieved in all patients but one. Nodal recurrence was statistically more likely in patients presenting with a local recurrence. Analysis of the specimens demonstrated complete histologic response to IC in 25 (37.3%) patients. A strong statistical relation (P <0.0001) was noted between complete clinical response after IC and complete histologic response. Conclusions. The change from the prevailing treatment modalities of RT and VPL to a new multimodal stategy (IC + CHEP) did not decrease survival and allowed for an increase in laryngeal preservation rate. The high rate (37.3%) of complete histologic response suggests that IC deserves further consideration in the management of patients with glottic carcinoma classified as T2. The favorable results achieved in this series, when compared with historic controls, should stimulate prospective clinical trials comparing the two surgical procedures (CHEP vs. VPL with or without IC) for resection of Stage II glottic carcinoma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.