To evaluate the role of oncogenic RAS mutations in pancreatic tumorigenesis, we directed endogenous expression of KRAS(G12D) to progenitor cells of the mouse pancreas. We find that physiological levels of Kras(G12D) induce ductal lesions that recapitulate the full spectrum of human pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs), putative precursors to invasive pancreatic cancer. The PanINs are highly proliferative, show evidence of histological progression, and activate signaling pathways normally quiescent in ductal epithelium, suggesting potential therapeutic and chemopreventive targets for the cognate human condition. At low frequency, these lesions also progress spontaneously to invasive and metastatic adenocarcinomas, establishing PanINs as definitive precursors to the invasive disease. Finally, mice with PanINs have an identifiable serum proteomic signature, suggesting a means of detecting the preinvasive state in patients.

Erratum Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouseIn the article by Hingorani et al. (Cancer Cell 4,, there are several typographical errors in the text regarding the citation of the figures. On page 441, the sentence "In many of the older mice, the pancreata contained extensive ductal lesions, and the acinar parenchyma was largely replaced by an intense stromal, or desmoplastic, reaction comprised of inflammatory cells, fibroblasts, and collagen deposition (Figures 2I-2K)" should instead refer to Figures 2I-2L. Also on page 441, the sentence "Finally, we note that PanINs expressed only low levels of PDX-1, which can nevertheless be discerned when compared to the lack of expression in surrounding acini (Figures 2G and 2H) and to normal ducts in control animals (Figure 2I)" should refer instead to Figure 3, and thus should read "Finally, we note that PanINs expressed only low levels of PDX-1, which can nevertheless be discerned when compared to the lack of expression in surrounding acini (Figures 3G and 3H) and to normal ducts in control animals (Figure 3I)."

SLFN11 sensitizes cancer cells to a broad range of DNA-targeted therapies. Here we show that, in response to replication stress induced by camptothecin, SLFN11 tightly binds chromatin at stressed replication foci via RPA1 together with the replication helicase subunit MCM3. Unlike ATR, SLFN11 neither interferes with the loading of CDC45 and PCNA nor inhibits the initiation of DNA replication but selectively blocks fork progression while inducing chromatin opening across replication initiation sites. The ATPase domain of SLFN11 is required for chromatin opening, replication block, and cell death but not for the tight binding of SLFN11 to chromatin. Replication stress by the CHK1 inhibitor Prexasertib also recruits SLFN11 to nascent replicating DNA together with CDC45 and PCNA. We conclude that SLFN11 is recruited to stressed replication forks carrying extended RPA filaments where it blocks replication by changing chromatin structure across replication sites.