Conformational changes are thought to underlie the activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors. Such changes in rhodopsin were explored by construction of double cysteine mutants, each containing one cysteine at the cytoplasmic end of helix C and one cysteine at various positions in the cytoplasmic end of helix F. Magnetic dipolar interactions between spin labels attached to these residues revealed their proximity, and changes in their interaction upon rhodopsin light activation suggested a rigid body movement of helices relative to one another. Disulfide cross-linking of the helices prevented activation of transducin, which suggests the importance of this movement for activation of rhodopsin.

Thirty single cysteine substitution mutants of T4 lysozyme have been prepared and spin-labeled with a sulfhydryl-specific nitroxide reagent in order to systematically investigate the relationship between nitroxide side-chain mobility and protein structure. The perturbation caused by replacement of a native residue with a nitroxide amino acid was assessed from the resulting changes in biological activity, circular dichroism, and free energy of folding. The nitroxide produced context-dependent changes in stability and activity similar to those observed for substitution with natural amino acids at the same site but had little effect on the circular dichroism spectra. At solvent-exposed sites, the structural perturbation appears to be small at the level of the backbone fold. Nitroxide side-chain mobility faithfully reflects the protein tertiary fold at all sites investigated. The primary determinants of nitroxide side-chain mobility are tertiary interactions and backbone dynamics. Tertiary interactions constrain the side-chain mobility to an extent closely correlated with the degree of interaction. At interhelical loop sites, the side chains have a high mobility, consistent with high crystallographic thermal factors. On the exposed surfaces of alpha-helices, the side-chain mobility is not restricted by interactions with nearest neighbor side chains but appears to be determined by backbone dynamics. An unexpected result is a striking difference between the mobility of residues near the C- and N-termini of helices. These results provide the foundation for another dimension of information in site-directed spin-labeling experiments that can be interpreted in terms of the protein tertiary fold, its equilibrium dynamics and time-dependent conformational changes.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signal primarily through G proteins or arrestins. Arrestin binding to GPCRs blocks G protein interaction and redirects signaling to numerous G proteinindependent pathways. Here we report the crystal structure of a constitutively active form of human rhodopsin bound to a pre-activated form of the mouse visual arrestin, determined by serial femtosecond X-ray laser crystallography. Together with extensive biochemical and mutagenesis data, the structure reveals an overall architecture of the rhodopsin-arrestin assembly, in which rhodopsin uses distinct structural elements, including TM7 and Helix 8 to recruit arrestin. Correspondingly, arrestin adopts the pre-activated conformation, with a ~20° rotation between the Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms § Correspondence to H. Eric Xu: Eric.Xu@vai.org. * These authors contributed equally.Contributions: Y.K. initiated the project, developed the expression and purification methods for rhodopsin-arrestin complex, and bulk-purified expression constructs and proteins used in LCP crystallization for the SFX method; X.E.Z. collected the synchrotron data, helped with the SFX data collection, processed the data, and solved the structures; X.G. expressed and purified rhodopsinarrestin complexes, characterized their binding and thermal stability, discovered the initial crystallization conditions with 9.7 MAG, prepared most crystals for synchrotron data collection, prepared all crystals for the final data collection by SFX, helped with SFX data collection, and established the initial cross-linking method for the rhodopsin-arrestin complex; Y.H. designed and performed Tango assays and disulfide bond cross-linking experiments; C.Z. developed the mammalian expression methods; P.W.dW helped with XFEL data processing and performed computational experiments; J.K., M.H.E.T., K. M. S-P., K. P., J. M., Y.J., X.Y.Z., and Q.C. performed cell culture, mutagenesis, protein purification, rhodopsin-arrestin binding experiments; W.L. and A.I. grew crystals and collected synchrotron data at APS and SFX data at LCLS, G.W.H. and Q.X. determined and validated the structure. Z.Z. and V.K. constructed the full model, the phosphorylated rhodopsin-arrestin model, and help writing the paper; D.W., S.L., D.J., C.K., Sh.B., and N.A. Z. helped with XFEL data collection and initial data analysis; S.B., M.M., and G.J.W. set up the XFEL experiment, performed the data collection, and commented on the paper. A.B., T.W., C.G., O.Y., and H.C. helped with XFEL data collection and data analysis, processed the data and helped with structure validation. G.M. W., B.P., and P.G. performed HDX experiments and helped with manuscript writing. J.L. helped initiate this collaborative project and with writing the paper. M.W. collected the 7.7 Å dataset at Swiss Light Source. A.M.,...