At a distance of 1.295 parsecs, 1 the red-dwarf Proxima Centauri (α Centauri C, GL 551, HIP 70890, or simply Proxima) is the Sun's closest stellar neighbour and one of the best studied low-mass stars. It has an effective temperature of only ∼ 3050 K, a luminosity of ∼0.1 per cent solar, a measured radius of 0.14 R ⊙ 2 and a mass of about 12 per cent the mass of the Sun. Although Proxima is considered a moderately active star, its rotation period is ∼ 83 days, 3 and its quiescent activity levels and X-ray luminosity 4 are comparable to the Sun's. New observations reveal the presence of a small planet orbiting Proxima with a minimum mass of 1.3 Earth masses and an orbital period of ∼11.2 days. Its orbital semi-major axis is ∼ 0.05 AU, with an equilibrium temperature in the range where water could be liquid on its surface. 5 The results presented here consist of the analysis of previously obtained Doppler measurements (pre-2016 data), and the confirmation of a signal in a specifically designed follow-up campaign in 2016. The Doppler data comes from two precision radial velocity instruments, both at the European Southern Observatory (ESO): the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS) and the Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES). HARPS is a high-resolution stabilized echelle spectrometer installed at the ESO 3.6m telescope (La Silla observatory, Chile), and is calibrated in wavelength using hollow cathode lamps. HARPS has demonstrated radial velocity measurements at ∼1 ms −1 precision over time-scales of years, 6 including on low-mass stars. 7 All HARPS spectra were extracted and calibrated with the standard ESO Data Reduction Software, and radial velocities were measured using a least-squares template matching technique. 7 HARPS data is separated into two datasets. The first set includes all data obtained before 2016 by several programmes (HARPS pre-2016 work, and its value is then used to assess the false-alarm probability (or FAP) of the detection. 14 A FAP below 1% is considered suggestive of periodic variability, and anything below 0.1% is considered to be a significant detection. In the Bayesian framework, signals are first searched using a specialized sampling method 16 that enables exploration of multiple local maxima of the posterior density (the result of this process are the gray lines in Figure 1), and significances are then assessed by obtaining the ratios of evidences of models. If the evidence ratio exceeds some threshold (e.g. B 1 /B 0 > 10 3 ), then the model in the numerator (with one planet) is favoured against the model in the denominator (no planet).A well isolated peak at ∼11.2 days was recovered when analyzing all the night averages in the pre-2016 datasets (Figure 1, panel a). Despite the significance of the signal, the analysis of pre-2016 subsets produced slightly different periods depending on the noise assumptions and which subsets were considered. Confirmation or refutation of this signal at 11.2 days was the main driver for proposing the HARPS PRD campaign. T...
Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope (LCOGT) is a young organization dedicated to time-domain observations at optical and (potentially) near-IR wavelengths. To this end, LCOGT is constructing a world-wide network of telescopes, including the two 2m Faulkes telescopes, as many as 17 x 1m telescopes, and as many as 23 x 40cm telescopes. These telescopes initially will be outfitted for imaging and (excepting the 40cm telescopes) spectroscopy at wavelengths between the atmospheric UV cutoff and the roughly 1-micron limit of silicon detectors. Since the first of LCOGT's 1m telescopes are now being deployed, we lay out here LCOGT's scientific goals and the requirements that these goals place on network architecture and performance, we summarize the network's present and projected level of development, and we describe our expected schedule for completing it. In the bulk of the paper, we describe in detail the technical approaches that we have adopted to attain the desired performance. In particular, we discuss our choices for the number and location of network sites, for the number and sizes of telescopes, for the specifications of the first generation of instruments, for the software that will schedule and control the network's telescopes and reduce and archive its data, and for the structure of the scientific and educational programs for which the network will provide observations.Comment: 59 pages, 9 figures, 4 tables. AAS Latex v5.2. Accepted for publication in Pub. Astr. Soc. Pacifi
We present the first measurement of the planet frequency beyond the "snow line," for the planet-to-star mass-ratio interval −4.5 < log q < −2, corresponding to the range of ice giants to gas giants. We find d 2 N pl d log q d log s = (0.36 ± 0.15) dex −2 at the mean mass ratio q = 5 × 10 −4 with no discernible deviation from a flat (Öpik's law) distribution in logprojected separation s. The determination is based on a sample of six planets detected from intensive follow-up observations of high-magnification (A > 200) microlensing events during 2005-2008. The sampled host stars have a typical mass M host ∼ 0.5 M , and detection is sensitive to planets over a range of planet-star-projected separations (s −1 max R E , s max R E), where R E ∼ 3.5 AU (M host /M) 1/2 is the Einstein radius and s max ∼ (q/10 −4.3) 1/3. This corresponds to deprojected separations roughly three times the "snow line." We show that the observations of these events have the properties of a "controlled experiment," which is what permits measurement of absolute planet frequency. High-magnification events are rare, but the survey-plus-follow-up high-magnification channel is very efficient: half of all high-mag events were successfully monitored and half of these yielded planet detections. The extremely high sensitivity of high-mag events leads to a policy of monitoring them as intensively as possible, independent of whether they show evidence of planets. This is what allows us to construct an unbiased sample. The planet frequency derived from microlensing is a factor 8 larger than the one derived from Doppler studies at factor ∼25 smaller star-planet separations (i.e., periods 2-2000 days). However, this difference is basically consistent with the gradient derived from Doppler studies (when extrapolated well beyond the separations from which it is measured). This suggests a universal separation distribution across 2 dex in planet-star separation, 2 dex in mass ratio, and 0.3 dex in host mass. Finally, if all planetary systems were "analogs" of the solar system, our sample would have yielded 18.2 planets (11.4 "Jupiters," 6.4 "Saturns," 0.3 "Uranuses," 0.2 "Neptunes") including 6.1 systems with two or more planet detections. This compares to six planets including one twoplanet system in the actual sample, implying a first estimate of 1/6 for the frequency of solar-like systems.
Searches for extrasolar planets have uncovered an astonishing diversity of planetary systems, yet the frequency of solar system analogs remains unknown. The gravitational microlensing planet search method is potentially sensitive to multiple-planet systems containing analogs of all the solar system planets except Mercury. We report the detection of a multiple-planet system with microlensing. We identify two planets with masses of approximately 0.71 and approximately 0.27 times the mass of Jupiter and orbital separations of approximately 2.3 and approximately 4.6 astronomical units orbiting a primary star of mass approximately 0.50 solar mass at a distance of approximately 1.5 kiloparsecs. This system resembles a scaled version of our solar system in that the mass ratio, separation ratio, and equilibrium temperatures of the planets are similar to those of Jupiter and Saturn. These planets could not have been detected with other techniques; their discovery from only six confirmed microlensing planet detections suggests that solar system analogs may be common.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.