Introduction Port-wine stain (PWS) is a progressive capillary malformation that does not resolve spontaneously without treatment. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) is currently the gold standard treatment for PWS, although it is difficult to attain complete clearance and recurrences are common. This study determined the cost-effectiveness of PDL treatment among Thai patients with facial PWS. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of 109 Thai patients with facial PWS and treated with PDL at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand from January 2008 to December 2017. The primary outcome of the study was the cost-effectiveness of PDL treatment in the clinical improvement of facial PWS. Results Ten PDL treatment sessions will have an expected clinical improvement of 60%. At the 10th treatment, the marginal incremental improvement with respect to visit is approximately equal to one. The succeeding treatment sessions will only give an additional improvement of 5–10%. Conclusion A total of 10 PDL treatment sessions was considered cost-effective as it can achieve 60% clinical improvement among Thai patients with facial PWS.

BackgroundChronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) constitutes a group of nine different CIndUs in which pruritic wheals and/or angioedema occur after exposure to specific and definite triggers. Histamine released from activated and degranulating skin mast cells is held to play a key role in the pathogenesis of CIndU, but evidence to support this has, as of yet, not been reviewed systematically or in detail. We aim to characterize the role and relevance of histamine in CIndU.MethodsWe systematically searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) for studies that reported increased serum or skin histamine concentration (direct evidence) or in vitro or ex vivo histamine release (indirect evidence) following trigger exposure.ResultsAn initial total of 3,882 articles was narrowed down to 107 relevant studies of which 52 were in cold urticaria, 19 in cholinergic urticaria, 14 in heat urticaria, 10 in contact urticaria, 7 each in solar urticaria and vibratory angioedema, 4 each in symptomatic dermographism and aquagenic urticaria, and 3 in delayed pressure urticaria. The results of our review support that histamine has a key pathogenic role in the pathogenesis of all CIndUs, but it is not the sole mediator as evidenced by the often poor relationship between the level of histamine and severity of symptoms and the variable clinical efficacy of H1-antihistamines.ConclusionsHistamine released from skin mast cells is a key driver of the development of signs and symptoms and a promising therapeutic target in CIndU.

Introduction: Monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) is a valuable modality for tightening and contouring mild-to-moderate facial skin laxity. Few studies have evaluated new-generation MRF devices for lower facial laxity in Asians. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRF for treating lower facial laxity in Asians. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 30 volunteers with Fitzpatrick Skin Types III-V and mild-to-moderate skin laxity. Subjects received a single MRF treatment. Self-assessments and adverse events were recorded. Two blinded dermatologists graded improvements (6-point scale) after treatment and 1, 3, and 6 months later. Results: All subjects completed the study. Treatment energy levels ranged from 2 to 4. The average number of shots was 412 ± 49, delivered in 3-4 passes with 15-30% overlap. All patients reported improvement in lower facial laxity immediately after treatment. Most patients had mild-to-moderate improvement over the 6-month follow-up. Continuous improvement was observed at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups (P \ 0.01). Significant improvement was seen at the 6-month followup compared with the 1-month follow-up (P \ 0.01). Subjects tolerated the procedure well: the average pain score was 3.13 out of 10, and no serious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: The new-generation MRF device we tested was effective and safe for mild-tomoderate lower facial laxity in Asian skin. The latest MRF technology offers improved safety to prevent complications. Appropriate patient selection, setting, and protocols are mandatory to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. The Trial Registration Number: TCTR20 210326002.