Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying spasticity have been the subject of many studies. These studies performed in various kinds of spastic patients have revealed abnormalities in many spinal pathways controlling motoneurone discharge. Unfortunately, the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the development of spasticity remains nevertheless largely unknown since most of the previous studies failed to reveal a link between the characteristics of spasticity (severity, time course) and that of the dysfunction of a given perturbed spinal pathway. In the present series of experiments, we focused on the study of presynaptic mechanisms acting at the synapse fibre Ia-motoneurone since monosynaptic reflexes are enhanced in spasticity. Two presynaptic mechanisms have been described in both animals and humans: presynaptic Ia inhibition and post-activation depression. By increasing the number of subjects in comparison with previous studies (87 patients and 42 healthy controls) we have been able to show that these two mechanisms are unequally impaired in stroke patients depending on (i) the duration of the disease (acute, defined as less than 3 months after the causal lesion, or chronic, defined as more than 9 months after the causal lesion), (ii) the side considered (affected or unaffected) and (iii) the severity of spasticity. In this respect, only post-activation depression amount was found to be highly correlated with the severity of spasticity. Although not a definitive proof, this correlation between severity of spasticity and changes in a given spinal pathway lead us to conclude that the impairment of post-activation depression is likely one of the mechanisms underlying spasticity. On the contrary, changes in presynaptic Ia inhibition appear to be a simple epiphenomenon, i.e. a basic correlate of the brain lesions. It is argued that plastic changes develop from the disuse due to motor command impairment in both pathways.

The present studies are designed to further characterise the interneuronal pathway mediating the disynaptic reciprocal group I inhibition between flexors and extensors at the wrist and the elbow levels in humans. In the first series of experiments, we compared the electrical threshold of the reciprocal group I inhibition at the wrist and the elbow level after a prolonged vibration aimed at raising the electrical threshold of the antagonistic activated Ia afferents. Prolonged vibration to the 'conditioning' tendon, which raised significantly the electrical threshold of the inhibition at the elbow level, did not alter it at the wrist level. These results suggest that the dominant input to the relevant interneurones is Ia in origin at the elbow level but Ib in origin at the wrist level. In the second series of experiments, using the spatial facilitation method, we compared the effects on the post-stimulus time histograms of single voluntarily activated motor units of two volleys delivered both separately and together to group I afferents in the nerves supplying the homonymous and antagonistic muscles. At the wrist, but not at the elbow level, the peak of homonymous monosynaptic group I excitation was reduced on combined stimulation, although the antagonistic IPSP was just at the threshold. Because the suppression did not involve the initial bins of the peak, it is argued that the suppression is not due to presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals, but probably reflects convergence between the homonymous and antagonistic volleys onto the interneurones mediating the disynaptic inhibition. Taken together with the previously reported effects of recurrent inhibition on reciprocal inhibition, these results suggest that inhibition between flexors and extensors is differently organised at the elbow (reciprocal Ia inhibition) and the wrist (non-reciprocal group I inhibition) levels. It is argued that the particular connectivity at the wrist level might correspond to some functional requirements at this ball joint.