A ~4000 km long ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic (UHPM) belt in northern China has been documented on the basis of the discovery of coesite-bearing rocks in the Altun-North Qaidam terrane in the western Central Orogenic Belt (COB), and diamond-bearing rocks in Qinling in the central and Dabie-Sulu terrane in the east. New SIMS and SHRIMP U-Pb dates of zircons from coesitebearing UHPM rocks indicate two UHPM events: one in the early Paleozoic and the other in theTriassic. Coesite-bearing zircons from a North Qaidam gneiss yielded UHP metamorphic ages of 452 ± 13.8 Ma and retrograde ages of 419 ± 6.7 Ma. A diamond-bearing gneiss from Qinling gave a lower intercept age of 502 ± 45 Ma, and an upper intercept age of 1545 ± 100 Ma, whereas a Qinling eclogite sample gave a lower intercept age of 493 ± 170 Ma and an upper intercept age of 1381 ± 82 Ma. The lower and upper intercept ages of the Qinling samples are interpreted as UHPM and protolith ages of the rocks, respectively. Coesite-bearing zircons from a Qinglongshan eclogite in the south Sulu belt yielded early Paleozoic UHPM ages of 441 ± 9 Ma, 449 ± 9 Ma, and 442 ± 9 Ma, whereas the core of a zircon containing plagioclase and apatite inclusions gave a protolith age of 761 ± 13 Ma. These age data suggest that the early Paleozoic UHPM rocks extend from west to east for about 4000 km across the COB, whereas the Triassic UHPM belt extends across the Dabie-Sulu region for about 1000 km.Based on available geochronological and geochemical data, we suggest the following tectonic model for evolution of the COB. At about 1000 Ma, the area was amalgamated to form the Rodinian continent, which contained ophiolitic fragments of oceanic affinity. This part of Rodinia was then rifted at about 800-750 Ma to form an oceanic basin with a variety of MORB and intruded by granitic plutons. Closure of this ocean basin produced Neoproterozoic ophiolites and granitic gneisses. The UHPM rocks, along with subduction-related island-arc volcanics and granites of early Paleozoic age suggest a second cycle of rifting and subduction along the COB, whereas the Triassic UHPM rocks record a final subduction and collision event between the North China and South China blocks.
This paper provides further evidence for the ongoing discussion as to whether the Dabie UHPM belt formed in Triassic or Palaeozoic time, and whether the Sulu UHPM belt formed in Triassic or Neoproterozoic time. Combined use of laser Raman spectrometer (LR), cathodoluminescence imaging (CL), and ion probe U-Pb in-situ dating (SHRIMP) provided accurate ages of UHPM from rocks collected from Weihai, NE Sulu UHPM belt. LR was used to identify coesite and other UHP minerals as inclusions in zircon separates from an amphibolized peridotite and an eclogite. CL was used to examine the zoning structure of these zircon, and SHRIMP dating was performed on specific spots on zircon to obtain ages of different geological events. An age of 221 ± 12 Ma was obtained for coesite-bearing zircon from the amphibolized peridotite; an age of 228 ± 29 Ma for eclogite was obtained from the lower intercept of a concordia plot. These ages are interpreted as the time of UHPM in the Weihai region. Ultramafic rocks to the east of Weihai yield a magmatic age at 581 ± 44 Ma. The zircon in the ultramafic rocks possibly also records a thermal event at c. 400 Ma, but no independent geological evidence for this event has been found. The eclogite protolith formed in the Middle Proterozoic (1821 ± 19 Ma), which is similar to the age of country rock gneisses of 1847-1744 Ma. The new geochronological data confirm that UHPM occurred in the Triassic in the Sulu area when subduction took the ultramafic body and the eclogite protolith, together with the adjacent supracrustal rocks, to mantle depths.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.