2017
DOI: 10.1002/cepa.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

00.02: Developments in research and assessment of steel structures: Highlights from the perspective of an American researcher

Abstract: The objective of this paper is to provide a summary of recent developments in the research and assessment of steel building structures. The task is too broad to accomplish in a general sense, as such the perspective and biases of the author as an American research professor who primarily focuses on thin-walled steel building applications is explicitly recognized. The discussed research is separated into three areas: cold-formed steel structures, hot-rolled steel structures, and earthquake engineering for steel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been observed [18,19] that the current AISI-S100-16 beam-column design approach can be overly conservative because the stability of the member under the actual stress distribution that arises due to the combined axial loading and bending is not directly considered; instead, as discussed above, a linear interaction between the purely axial and purely bending resistance end points is assumed. This effect has been investigated experimentally [20,21,22] and numerically [18,23], with a new extension to the DSM being recently proposed to account for potential strength increases if the actual stress distribution is considered [19,24,25].…”
Section: Design Of Cold-formed Steel Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed [18,19] that the current AISI-S100-16 beam-column design approach can be overly conservative because the stability of the member under the actual stress distribution that arises due to the combined axial loading and bending is not directly considered; instead, as discussed above, a linear interaction between the purely axial and purely bending resistance end points is assumed. This effect has been investigated experimentally [20,21,22] and numerically [18,23], with a new extension to the DSM being recently proposed to account for potential strength increases if the actual stress distribution is considered [19,24,25].…”
Section: Design Of Cold-formed Steel Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their high strength-to-weight ratio, cold-formed steel members offer lightweight and low-carbon structural solutions in construction (Hancock 2016;Schafer 2017). However, as a result of their thin-walled geometry, cold-formed steel members are highly susceptible to instability phenomena, such as local, distortional and global buckling together with their interactions, which limit their load-carrying capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%