0287 Trends In Self-reported Sleep Duration And Disturbance In The US General Population: NHANES 2005–2014

Hou, Yuxuan; Liu, X; Liu, J

doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.286

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study, the estimated sleep duration was 7.59 hours and the proportion of adults with short sleep (<7 hours) and long sleep (≥9 hours) were 23.1% and 19.7%, respectively, on workdays. These findings were not consistent with previous studies showing a sleep duration of 7.18 hours in 2012 among US adults aged 18 years and older and 7.00 hours in 2014 among adults aged 16 years and older. Consistently, the prevalence of adults with sleep shorter than 7 hours in this study was lower than prior estimates from the National Health Interview Survey (29.2% in 2012) and from the Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (35.0% in 2014 and 13.0% in 2018) .…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…8,9 Consequently, it is crucial to comprehensively assess the current sleep habits and circadian characteristics among US adults, which could help address the sleep problems and their related health outcomes. Several studies 10,11 have reported the sleep duration among US adults only on workdays and the prevalence of sleep disturbances up to 2014. However, to our knowledge, no studies have explicitly investigated the sleep-wake timing and regularity of sleep habits across workdays and free days, all of which are essential components of healthy sleep.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies 10 , 11 have reported the sleep duration among US adults only on workdays and the prevalence of sleep disturbances up to 2014. However, to our knowledge, no studies have explicitly investigated the sleep-wake timing and regularity of sleep habits across workdays and free days, all of which are essential components of healthy sleep.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluation of Sleep Habits and Disturbances Among US Adults, 2017-2020

Guo

Daghlas

et al. 2022

JAMA Netw Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ImportanceUnhealthy sleep behaviors and sleep disturbances are associated with higher risk of multiple diseases and mortality. The current profiles of sleep habits and disturbances, particularly the differences between workdays and free days, are unknown in the contemporary US.ObjectiveTo comprehensively evaluate sleep habits on workdays and free days and the prevalence of sleep disturbances among US adults.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis study is a cross-sectional analysis of US nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-2020) among adults aged 20 years or older. Data analysis was performed from February to May 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were means and/or distributions of sleep habits, including sleep duration and sleep-wake timing on workdays and free days, sleep debt (ie, the difference between sleep duration on free days and mean weekly sleep duration), and social jet lag (ie, the difference between the midpoint between sleep and wake time on workdays and free days). Prevalence of trouble sleeping (ie, participants told a doctor or other health professional that they have trouble sleeping) and daytime sleepiness (ie, self-reported feeling of being overly sleepy during the day ≥5 times per month) were also determined.ResultsA total of 9004 individuals (mean [SE] age, 48.3 [0.53] years; 4635 women [51.9%]; 3158 non-Hispanic White [62.8%]) were included in the current study. The mean sleep duration was 7.59 hours (95% CI, 7.54 to 7.64 hours) on workdays and 8.24 hours (95% CI, 8.17 to 8.31 hours) on free days (difference, 0.65 hour). The mean sleep and wake times were at 11:02 pm (95% CI, 10:57 pm to 11:17 pm) and 6:41 am (95% CI, 6:36 am to 6:45 am), respectively, on workdays and 11:25 pm (95% CI, 11:21 pm to 11:35 pm) and 7:41 am (95% CI, 7:37 am to 7:46 am), respectively, on free days (differences, 0.23 hour for sleep time and 1.00 hour for wake time). On workdays, 23.1% (95% CI, 21.3% to 24.9%) of adults slept less than 7 hours and 25.4% (95% CI, 24.1% to 26.6%) went to sleep at midnight or later; the corresponding percentages changed to 12.9% (95% CI, 11.6% to 14.1%) and 40.9% (95% CI, 38.4% to 43.5%), respectively, on free days. Furthermore, the mean sleep debt was 0.73 hours (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.77 hours), and mean social jet lag was 1.10 hours (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.15 hours); 30.5% (95% CI, 26.8% to 33.3%) of adults experienced 1 hour or more of sleep debt, and 46.5% (95% CI, 42.6% to 50.3%) experienced 1 hour or more of social jet lag. The prevalence of trouble sleeping was 29.8% (95% CI, 28.2% to 31.5%), and that of daytime sleepiness was 27.2% (95% CI, 25.0% to 29.5%).Conclusions and RelevanceIn 2017 to 2020, US adults showed variability in sleep habits between workdays and free days, with longer sleep duration and later sleep-wake phases on free days, and high percentages of US adults experienced long-term sleep deprivation, chronic social jet lag, and frequent sleep disturbances. These findings provide evidence to further investigate potential approaches to optimize overall US sleep health.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of Sleep Habits and Disturbances Among US Adults, 2017-2020

Guo

Daghlas

et al. 2022

JAMA Netw Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Leisure Luxuries and the Labor Supply of Young Men

Aguiar

Bils

Charles

2021

Journal of Political Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

and the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta, Chicago and Richmond for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

show abstract