2017
DOI: 10.1002/cepa.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

05.41: A unified catastrophe theory approach for the in‐plane buckling of steel arches under point gravitational loading

Abstract: The problem of the buckling response of various types of steel arches has been the subject of a vast number of earlier as well as recent papers and chapters of books. Namely, the majority of all these works aimed -via analytical and/or computational approaches -to establish the nature of the postbuckling response of the foregoing structures. It has been found over the years that two types of loss of in-plane stability are dominant: (a) snap-through, a characteristic of shallow (flat) arches (low height to span… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distinctive features of arched buildings are the ability of quick erection, a small mass of structures, low construction costs and the need to take into account the impact of thrust support reactions when designing the foundations of arched buildings [6][7][8][9][10]. The problem of perceiving thrust structures and reducing the material consumption for the foundation construction in arched buildings constructors solve by installing tie-beams between the arches' supports [11][12][13][14][15]. Builders face some problems when installing the tie-beams in arched structures: the need for their hidden installation in the construction of the floors; the necessity to prestress them to maintain a working condition at large spans; the impossibility of standard installation of tie-beams between the arch supports when utility lines of technological objects of the building located between the arch supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinctive features of arched buildings are the ability of quick erection, a small mass of structures, low construction costs and the need to take into account the impact of thrust support reactions when designing the foundations of arched buildings [6][7][8][9][10]. The problem of perceiving thrust structures and reducing the material consumption for the foundation construction in arched buildings constructors solve by installing tie-beams between the arches' supports [11][12][13][14][15]. Builders face some problems when installing the tie-beams in arched structures: the need for their hidden installation in the construction of the floors; the necessity to prestress them to maintain a working condition at large spans; the impossibility of standard installation of tie-beams between the arch supports when utility lines of technological objects of the building located between the arch supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%