2015
DOI: 10.20919/sspt.25.2015.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

07. Social freedom in contemporary capitalism: A reconstruction of Axel Honneth’s normative approach to the economy

Abstract: This paper discusses two related issues, namely how to adequately describe the economy within the framework of a critical social theory, and how to understand the interrelation between the socio-economic and political dimensions of democracy. Concerning the first issue Honneth stresses the moral quality of social integration, and concerning the second issue he develops a conception of ‘democratic Sittlichkeit.’ In reconstructing these issues, both the promises and problems of Honneth’s work for analyzing and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. 8 Honneth's early engagement with craft-work is aimed at demonstrating something like this second claim, i.e., that even relatively Fordist models of industrial production require selfdetermining activity on the part of individual workers (Honneth 1980, Arentshorst 2015. 9 Of course, there is the additional question of what, metaphysically, is an individual agent in Hegel's sense.…”
Section: Christopher Yeomansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. 8 Honneth's early engagement with craft-work is aimed at demonstrating something like this second claim, i.e., that even relatively Fordist models of industrial production require selfdetermining activity on the part of individual workers (Honneth 1980, Arentshorst 2015. 9 Of course, there is the additional question of what, metaphysically, is an individual agent in Hegel's sense.…”
Section: Christopher Yeomansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hans Arentshorst has characterized this shift by saying thatHonneth has moved between two opposites in the thirty years between the articles ‘Labor and instrumental action’ (1980) and ‘Labor and recognition’ (2010a). Whereas his early craftsman ideal was immanent but lacked rationality, his recent approach of normative functionalism is rational but lacks immanence… (Arentshorst 2015: 142)…”
Section: Honneth and The Dualism Of Contemporary Critical Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%