Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
We study nonassociative rings R R satisfying the conditions (1) ( a b , c , d ) + ( a , b , [ c , d ] ) = a ( b , c , d ) + ( a , c , d ) b (ab,c,d) + (a,b,[c,d]) = a(b,c,d) + (a,c,d)b for all a , b , c , d ∈ R a,b,c,d \in R , and (2) ( x , x , x ) = 0 (x,x,x) = 0 for all x ∈ R x \in R . We furthermore assume weakly characteristic not 2 and weakly characteristic not 3. As both (1) and (2) are consequences of the right alternative law, our rings are generalizations of right alternative rings. We show that rings satisfying (1) and (2) which are simple and have an idempotent ≠ 0 , ≠ 1 \ne 0, \ne 1 , are right alternative rings. We show by example that ( x , e , e ) (x,e,e) may be nonzero. In general, R = R ′ + ( R , e , e ) R = R’ + (R,e,e) (additive direct sum) where R ′ R’ is a subring and ( R , e , e ) (R,e,e) is a nilpotent ideal which commutes elementwise with R R . We examine R ′ R’ under the added assumption of Lie admissibility: (3) ( a , b , c ) + ( b , c , a ) + ( c , a , b ) = 0 (a,b,c) + (b,c,a) + (c,a,b) = 0 for all a , b , c ∈ R a,b,c \in R . We generate the Peirce decomposition. If R ′ R’ has no trivial ideals contained in its center, the table for the multiplication of the summands is associative, and the nucleus of R ′ R’ contains R 10 ′ + R 01 ′ {R’_{10}} + {R’_{01}} . Without the assumption on ideals, the table for the multiplication need not be associative; however, if the multiplication is defined in the most obvious way to force an associative table, the new ring will still satisfy (1), (2), (3).
We study nonassociative rings R R satisfying the conditions (1) ( a b , c , d ) + ( a , b , [ c , d ] ) = a ( b , c , d ) + ( a , c , d ) b (ab,c,d) + (a,b,[c,d]) = a(b,c,d) + (a,c,d)b for all a , b , c , d ∈ R a,b,c,d \in R , and (2) ( x , x , x ) = 0 (x,x,x) = 0 for all x ∈ R x \in R . We furthermore assume weakly characteristic not 2 and weakly characteristic not 3. As both (1) and (2) are consequences of the right alternative law, our rings are generalizations of right alternative rings. We show that rings satisfying (1) and (2) which are simple and have an idempotent ≠ 0 , ≠ 1 \ne 0, \ne 1 , are right alternative rings. We show by example that ( x , e , e ) (x,e,e) may be nonzero. In general, R = R ′ + ( R , e , e ) R = R’ + (R,e,e) (additive direct sum) where R ′ R’ is a subring and ( R , e , e ) (R,e,e) is a nilpotent ideal which commutes elementwise with R R . We examine R ′ R’ under the added assumption of Lie admissibility: (3) ( a , b , c ) + ( b , c , a ) + ( c , a , b ) = 0 (a,b,c) + (b,c,a) + (c,a,b) = 0 for all a , b , c ∈ R a,b,c \in R . We generate the Peirce decomposition. If R ′ R’ has no trivial ideals contained in its center, the table for the multiplication of the summands is associative, and the nucleus of R ′ R’ contains R 10 ′ + R 01 ′ {R’_{10}} + {R’_{01}} . Without the assumption on ideals, the table for the multiplication need not be associative; however, if the multiplication is defined in the most obvious way to force an associative table, the new ring will still satisfy (1), (2), (3).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.