2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1+1D implicit disk computations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of this study is the combination of a full hydrodynamic disk simulation and a stellar spin evolution model. The disk evolution is treated with the implicit hydrodynamics TAPIR code (Ragossnig et al 2020;Steiner et al 2021) and the stellar spin model is formulated in detail in Matt et al (2010); and Gallet et al (2019). Here, we want to give a recap of the respective model's key features.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus of this study is the combination of a full hydrodynamic disk simulation and a stellar spin evolution model. The disk evolution is treated with the implicit hydrodynamics TAPIR code (Ragossnig et al 2020;Steiner et al 2021) and the stellar spin model is formulated in detail in Matt et al (2010); and Gallet et al (2019). Here, we want to give a recap of the respective model's key features.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combine hydrodynamic disk and protostellar spin evolution to study the long-term effects of stellar rotation on the protoplanetary disk. The adaptive, implicit hydrodynamic (TAPIR) code for protoplanetary disks (Ragossnig et al 2020;Steiner et al 2021), which is based on Dorfi (1998) and Stoekl & Dorfi (2014), is extended with a stellar evolution model. Following Matt et al (2010), this stellar evolution model includes a simplified description of the protostellar contraction (Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes a deviation from the Keplerian angular velocity u ϕ ∝ r −1/2 . Compared to the model presented in Ragossnig et al (2020), we added the influence of the stellar magnetic field, which is especially important in the inner part of the disk (e.g., Romanova et al 2002;Bessolaz et al 2008). The disk is assumed to be axisymmetric in angular direction and to be in hydrostatic equilibrium in vertical direction.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Disk Evolution With the Tapir Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disk is assumed to be axisymmetric in angular direction and to be in hydrostatic equilibrium in vertical direction. Our model is formulated in cylindrical coordinates with the planar components (r,ϕ), which are then discretized (for a comprehensive description regarding discretization and numerical properties, see Ragossnig et al 2020). The protoplanetary disk in our simulations is described in Eqs.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Disk Evolution With the Tapir Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent hydrodynamic models of MRI and thermal instability bursts (Bae et al 2013;Kadam et al 2020;Vorobyov et al 2020)) have strong limitations in modeling the innermost disk regions, therefore necessitating the development of numerical codes that can realistically treat the star-disk interface in global disk simulations. Combining the requirements of (i) self-consistent treatment of both the gas dynamics in the inner disk including the effects of a stellar magnetic field and the position of the inner disk radius, (ii) the inclusion of an energy equation to investigate the effects of TI-induced episodic accretion, and (iii) maintaining the ability to resolve the very inner disk parts of a few stellar radii and carry out long-term calculations up to a few million years, we choose to use an implicit 1+1D RHD code (TAPIR, see Stoekl & Dorfi 2014;Ragossnig et al 2020) that enables us to meet all the requirements without being time-step-limited by the Courant-Friedrichs-Levy (CFL) condition (Appendix A). Until now, no comparable numerical code has combined the above requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%