1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.1998.1569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1–370 GHz EPR Linewidths for K3CrO8: A Comprehensive Test for the Anderson–Weiss Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is about an order of magnitude higher than for the ultramarine blue radical, which is consistent with the much larger value of J for DPPH than for ultramarine blue. For K3CrO8 J = 1.35 K and the minimum in line width as a function of frequency occurs at about 100 GHz [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is about an order of magnitude higher than for the ultramarine blue radical, which is consistent with the much larger value of J for DPPH than for ultramarine blue. For K3CrO8 J = 1.35 K and the minimum in line width as a function of frequency occurs at about 100 GHz [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The line intensity increased further as the temperature lowered to 110 K and the signal linewidth was about 40 mT. The large linewidth of the signal is probably due to dipole-dipole broadening [29,30], while experiments performed in the range of temperature 110-300 K did not show any signal for b-Co(OH) 2 . The spectrum of a-Co(OH) 2 is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (Epr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall, however, that XMCD signals of paramagnetic phases were detected so far only under high magnetic bias fields (B 0 ≥ 5T) and at fairly low temperatures (T ≤ 20K): XDEPR spectra should thus be pumped at sub-THz frequencies [25]. For concentrated samples, there is an additional difficulty that the XDEPR lines could be rather broad if the exchange field (H ex ) does not largely exceed the dipolar field (H dd ) since, according to the Anderson-Weiss model for exchange narrowing, H ∝ H 2 dd /H ex [26,27]. XDEPR, nevertheless, could yield some unique information about the precession dynamics of orbital magnetization components in Van Vleck paramagnets that were proposed as polarizing agents for DNP applications [28].…”
Section: Precession Dynamics Of Z and S Z Up To Thz Pump Frequenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%