Dedicated to Professor Jack D. Dunitz. K. H. has known Jack for about 55 of his 80 years beginning when we were both post-doctoral fellows at Caltech. Those were fun times!The bridged homotropilidines have been of interest for decades because their molecules offer the potential for homoaromaticity. Although many of these have been shown not to be homoaromatic, the energy differences of the delocalized (homoaromatic) forms and the localized (nonhomoaromatic) ones, and the barriers to the interconversion of the localized forms via a Cope rearrangement, have been found to vary greatly. The title compound is a strong candidate for homoaromaticity, and, since the structures of the possible localized and delocalized forms could differ significantly, we have carried out an electron-diffraction investigation of it augmented by quantum-mechanical calculations with different basis sets at several levels of theory. Three models were explored: one representing a localized form of C s symmetry, one a delocalized form of C 2v symmetry, and one a 2 : 1 mixture of the localized/delocalized forms. Although none of the models could be ruled out, the experimental evidence slightly favors the C s form. These results are consistent with those from the DFT B3PW91 calculations with basis sets ranging from 6-31G(d) to cc-pVTZ, which, surprisingly, predict essentially equal thermally corrected free energies for each. The results are discussed.Introduction. ± The molecular structures of the bridged homotropilidines, of which bullvalene and semibullvalene (1) are important examples, have been of great interest for well over three decades. One reason for this interest is that the molecules might be homoaromatic [1] as a consequence of a −negative× barrier to a Cope rearrangement [2] as illustrated below for the skeleton of semibullvalene (1). The homoaromatic, or delocalized, form of the molecule, 1b, is expected to have C 2v symmetry, and the nonhomoaromatic, or localized, forms 1a and 1c should have C s symmetry. The most obvious structural differences between the homoaromatic and localized forms lie in the nearest-neighbor distances between atoms in the six-membered ring of 1b, and the corresponding atoms in 1a and 1c: in 1b the C 2 ÀC 3 , C 3 ÀC 4 , C 6 ÀC 7 , and C 7 ÀC 8 distances should be characteristic of C,C aromatic bonds (ca. 1.4 ä), while the C 2 ÀC 8 and C 4 ÀC 6 distances are expected to be elongated (ca. 2 ä), but in 1a (1c) their values as double, single, and nonbonds are anticipated [3].There is abundant experimental and theoretical evidence that the ground state of semibullvalene itself is not homoaromatic (for a summary of current information about