1994
DOI: 10.1021/jm00031a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1-(((7,7-Dimethyl-2(S)-(2(S)-amino-4-(methylsulfonyl)butyramido)bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-1(S)-yl)methyl)sulfonyl)-4-(2-methylphenyl)piperazine (L-368,899): An Orally Bioavailable, Non-Peptide Oxytocin Antagonist with Potential Utility for Managing Preterm Labor

Abstract: Modifications to the previously reported spiroindenylpiperidine camphor-sulfonamide oxytocin (OT) antagonist L-366,509 have produced a new series of o-tolylpiperazine (TP) camphor-sulfonamides. A number of analogues in the TP series that incorporate a modified or unmodified L-methionine sulfone amide at the C2 endo position on the camphor ring exhibit high affinity for OT receptors (IC50 = 1.3-15 nM) and good selectivity for binding to OT versus arginine vasopressin V1a and V2 receptors. Several of these analo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We blocked Oxtr signaling by administering L-368,899, a non-peptidergic Oxtr antagonist that penetrates the blood-brain barrier (OTA, 5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) (Boccia et al, 2007; 4), before training and/or testing. Males injected with saline (Figure 1D and E) (S-S: CS+ chamber = 184.07 ± 13.79 s; Center = 36.73 ± 8.79 s; CS− chamber = 79.10 ± 9.11 s, n = 7) or the antagonist before testing only (S-OTA: CS+ chamber = 163.61 ± 11.96 s; Center = 52.58 ± 12.48 s; CS− chamber = 82.37 ± 4.99 s, n = 6) maintained a preference for the CS+ chamber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We blocked Oxtr signaling by administering L-368,899, a non-peptidergic Oxtr antagonist that penetrates the blood-brain barrier (OTA, 5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) (Boccia et al, 2007; 4), before training and/or testing. Males injected with saline (Figure 1D and E) (S-S: CS+ chamber = 184.07 ± 13.79 s; Center = 36.73 ± 8.79 s; CS− chamber = 79.10 ± 9.11 s, n = 7) or the antagonist before testing only (S-OTA: CS+ chamber = 163.61 ± 11.96 s; Center = 52.58 ± 12.48 s; CS− chamber = 82.37 ± 4.99 s, n = 6) maintained a preference for the CS+ chamber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intranasal administration of OXT in macaques and humans leads to increases in OXT concentrations in both plasma and CSF (Dal Monte, Noble, Turchi, Cummins, & Averbeck, 2014; Striepens et al, 2013), but see, (Leng & Ludwig, 2015), about important considerations of intranasal OXT administration. The OXTa (L-368,899; provided by Dr. Peter Williams, Merck) is a non-peptide antagonist with high affinity for OXT receptors (it also has a high affinity for AVPRla and AVPRlb) (Manning et al, 2012; Williams et al, 1994). The OXTa (L-368,899) has been shown to localize in both CSF and brain areas known to contain neurons with OXT receptors in rodents after oral administration (Boccia, Goursaud, Bachevalier, Anderson, & Pedersen, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While L-368,899 shows a reasonably high preference towards oxytocin receptors versus vasopressin receptors (approximately 40-fold), it also binds to V 1a and V 2 vasopressin receptors [27]. It is difficult, if impossible, to choose a dose that would not affect vasopressin receptors upon in vivo drug delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%