1 This study describes the pharmacological comparison of the muscarinic partial agonists sabcomeline, xanomeline and milameline at human cloned muscarinic receptor subtypes (hM 1 ± 5 ). 2 Radioligand binding studies at the hM 1 ± 5 muscarinic receptor subtypes were compared with functional studies using microphysiometry using carbachol as the standard full agonist. 3 In binding assays none of the compounds studied displayed preferential a nity for the M 1,3,4 or M 5 subtypes although carbachol was less potent at hM 1 than hM 3,4,5 . 4 In functional studies, all of the compounds studied displayed similar levels of e cacy across the muscarinic receptors with the exception of M 3 , where there was a large apparent receptor reserve and the compounds behaved essentially as full agonists. 5 Sabcomeline was the most potent agonist in functional studies but also showed the lowest e cacy. In terms of potency, xanomeline showed some selectivity for M 1 over M 2 receptors and milameline showed some selectivity for M 2 over M 1 receptors. 6 These results show the value of microphysiometry in being able to compare receptor pharmacology across subtypes irrespective of the signal transduction pathway. 7 None of the partial agonists showed functional selectivity for M 1 receptors, or indeed any muscarinic receptor, in the present study.