Co/Sr-hydroxyapatite catalyst (Co/Sr 10 (PO 4 ) 6 (OH) 2 : Co/ Sr-P) shows high activity and low carbon formation on ethanol steam reforming. H 2 -TPR measurements revealed that the Co species supported on Co/Sr-P was reduced only slightly more than that on typical Co/α-Al 2 O 3 . XAFS measurements revealed that Co 2+ species was observed mainly on the Co/Sr-P catalyst after H 2 -reduction at reaction temperature of 823 K. Co 2+ , i.e. CoO particle, on Co/Sr-P catalyst plays an important role as an active site for ethanol steam reforming with high coke resistance.Keywords: Hydrogen production | Hydroxyapatite support | Coke resistanceBiomass-derived ethanol (bioethanol) is anticipated as an important renewable resource.1 Especially, direct production of hydrogen by ethanol steam reforming is being developed intensively as a highly efficient energy production process.
2,3Moreover, since ethanol steam reforming is an endothermic reaction, as shown in eq 1, the reformate has a higher heating value of about 1450.9 kJ mol ¹1 (1277.4 for ethanol ¦H c + 173.5) after ethanol steam reforming. Therefore, ethanol steam reforming might increase the exergy rate considerably. 4 The exergy rate is defined as the ratio of Gibbs free energy (potential useful work) over the combustion enthalpy (energy supplied). Development of highly active and selective catalysts for ethanol steam reforming has been pursued actively. Among transition-metal catalysts, Co-based catalysts have been used extensively because of their higher activity and lower cost than those of noble metal catalysts.511 However, catalyst deactivation by coke formation presents an important difficulty. Therefore, the suppression of coke formation is strongly desired. Two solutions have been proposed for suppressing coke formation in ethanol steam reforming over Co-based catalysts: addition of another element 8,1014 and controlling the catalytic support. 6,7,1416 Reportedly, the use of basic supports (CeO 2 , ZnO, Mg-Al hydrotalcite, perovskite oxides, etc.) can suppress formations of coke and by-products effectively. The substituted hydroxyapatite supports were prepared using a hydrothermal method according to a published procedure with some modifications. 2022 The crystalline structure was confirmed using powder X-ray diffractometry (XRD). These XRD patterns were attributed to each hydroxyapatite with a single phase (not shown). Samples of the prepared M-phosphate and M-vanadate hydroxyapatite (M = Ca and Sr) supports are designated as Ca-P, Sr-P, Ca-V, and Sr-V.The Co catalysts supported on the hydroxyapatite supports were prepared using an impregnation method. Co(NO 3 ) 2 ¢6H 2 O was used as a metal precursor. The Co loading amount was 5 wt %. The hydroxyapatite support was mixed with distilled water in vacuo at room temperature for 2 h using a rotary evaporator. Then aqueous solution of Co precursor was added and stirred for 2 h. The obtained solution was then evaporated under heating and stirring. Subsequently, the obtained powder was dried at 393 K overnigh...