1. Comment peut-on être latiniste ?

http://cwr.yiil.org/home/archives_v3n2_04

“…As the WTO's jurisdiction on arbitration is not compulsory, especially concerning the implementation of the arbitration reports, "all the members should authorize" it in accordance with Articles 21 and 22 of the DSU is required. 43 There is also another suggestion in contemplating the possibility of extending the dispute jurisdiction of the WTO to the investor-state disputes. 44 The WTO's dispute settlement mechanism only applies to the on-going trade disputes, while the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism has been developed since the 1960s on the commercial arbitration rules.…”

“…49 However, if the WTO's jurisdiction is expanding as proposed, the amendments of DSU are necessary under the consensus requirement of the WTO. The former reform is contrary to the intention of the US of establishing regional trade courts or panels that could better take care of its interests, 50 while the latter reform intends to replace the fully fledged investor-state dispute settlement ("ISDS") by the WTO's dispute settlement, which will also be rejected by the inventors and beneficiaries of the ISDS rules, such as the US and the EU.…”