2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.11.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1/f Conductance noise in stabilized amorphous selenium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous publications [4,9] we mentioned that electrode type, alloy type and the thickness of the a-Se layer affects the 1/f noise and in this work it is quite evident that surface condition, alloy of the bulk material and the substrate temperature affect the 1/f noise quite significantly. Some samples produced Random Telegraphic type of noise (RTN) at a large electric field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous publications [4,9] we mentioned that electrode type, alloy type and the thickness of the a-Se layer affects the 1/f noise and in this work it is quite evident that surface condition, alloy of the bulk material and the substrate temperature affect the 1/f noise quite significantly. Some samples produced Random Telegraphic type of noise (RTN) at a large electric field.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The physical origin for most of materials is unknown. We reported some of the first measurements of 1/f noise in stabilized amorphous selenium (a-Se) alloys [4] that is Se with 0.3%-0.5% As (to retard crystallization) and tens of ppm Cl (to passivate defects). Stabilized a-Se is used in direct-conversion, X-ray digital radiography as the photoconductive layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously published measurements of the excess conductance noise in homogeneous layers of selenium alloys [5][6][7]. The noise was found to be sensitive to the metal used for the electrodes and to the surface conditions, and we concluded that the noise was generated at the metal-semiconductor interface rather than in the selenium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%