1990
DOI: 10.1109/16.59916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

1/f noise in MODFETs at low drain bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
79
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
79
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The best candidate to account for the anomalous noise seems to be ͑ii͒ when we assume a noisy series resistance in the channel dominating the noise of the channel but not its resistance. This has often been observed in submicron metalsemiconductor transistors, high electron mobility transistors 17 and metal-oxide-semiconductor ͑MOS͒ transistors. 18,21,22 …”
Section: On 1õf Noise As a Diagnostic Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best candidate to account for the anomalous noise seems to be ͑ii͒ when we assume a noisy series resistance in the channel dominating the noise of the channel but not its resistance. This has often been observed in submicron metalsemiconductor transistors, high electron mobility transistors 17 and metal-oxide-semiconductor ͑MOS͒ transistors. 18,21,22 …”
Section: On 1õf Noise As a Diagnostic Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the samples kave only one pair of contacts, as in FETs or MOSFETs, there is only one way to distinguish between contact noise and bulk noise: by applying an L-array [23,24]. An L-array is a set of samples submitted to homogeneous fields all having the same width but different lengths L between contacts.…”
Section: Four-point Measurements How To Suppress Contact Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When noise is independent of V G , only the ungated device channel noise (S I,U ) contributes and R G « R U . 15,16 This illustrates the potential of this method for distinguishing the evolution of the damage and to monitor the creation of the defects in the device channel during stress.5 Figure 3 depicts the change of the normalized current spectral density noise S I /I 2 versus the effective gate voltage V G before and during OFF-state stress. Immediately after the onset of the SBD, no increase in channel noise, neither in the gated nor ungated part, was apparent, even after several EL spots emerged, as demonstrated in figure 3(a) and its inset, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%