2012
DOI: 10.1891/1946-6560.3.4.e10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

#10 Motivations for Men and Women's Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: A Comprehensive Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, some previous research suggests that young couples experience bidirectional IPV and this prevalence ranges from 13% to 54% (Gray & Foshee, 1997;Melander, Noel, & Tyler, 2010;Renner & Whitney, 2010. While a proportion of our sample of young pregnant and parenting couples may be experiencing bidirectional IPV, it is important to note that bidirectional IPV may not be symmetrical (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, McCullars, & Misra, 2012) and we are unable to decipher motivations for IPV (e.g., self-defense) and the specific subtype of bidirectionally violent couples (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, 2010). However, the social learning theory suggests that being involved in violence may increase one's risk of being involved in a subsequent violent occurrence (Bandura & McClelland, 1977;Koenig & Clark, 2004), especially if internal working models are created from these experiences (McClellan & Killeen, 2000).…”
Section: Partner Effectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…First, some previous research suggests that young couples experience bidirectional IPV and this prevalence ranges from 13% to 54% (Gray & Foshee, 1997;Melander, Noel, & Tyler, 2010;Renner & Whitney, 2010. While a proportion of our sample of young pregnant and parenting couples may be experiencing bidirectional IPV, it is important to note that bidirectional IPV may not be symmetrical (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, McCullars, & Misra, 2012) and we are unable to decipher motivations for IPV (e.g., self-defense) and the specific subtype of bidirectionally violent couples (Langhinrichsen-Rohling, 2010). However, the social learning theory suggests that being involved in violence may increase one's risk of being involved in a subsequent violent occurrence (Bandura & McClelland, 1977;Koenig & Clark, 2004), especially if internal working models are created from these experiences (McClellan & Killeen, 2000).…”
Section: Partner Effectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This factor is important because it plays an essential role in facilitating problem solving, attentional focus, and developing and maintaining social relationships (Cole et al, 2004). For instance, it has been shown that some individuals are abusive towards their partners as a way of expressing PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OFFENDING 11 negative emotions (e.g., anger), which they have not learnt how to appropriately regulate (for a review, see Langhinrichsen-Rohling, McCullars, & Misra, 2012).…”
Section: Self-regulation and Emotional Self-regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aunque algunos estudios demuestran prevalencias similares de victimización y perpetración, la violencia hacia las mujeres da lugar a consecuencias más graves (p.ej. muerte) (Desmarais, Reeves, Nicholls, Telford y Fiebert, 2012;Langhinrichsen-Rohling, McCullars y Misra, 2012). Según Devries et al (2013), a nivel global, el 30% de las mujeres han experimentado violencia física y/o sexual por parte de sus parejas en algún momento de sus vidas.…”
Section: Violencia De Género En Mujeres Con Consumo De Sustancias Ingunclassified